Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 14;21(38):10866–10873. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i38.10866

Table 1.

Comparison of the clinicopathological features between patients with and without hepatoduodenal lymph node metastasis n (%)

n HDLN metastasis
Univariate Multivariate
Positive Negative P value OR (95%CI) P value
Total 276 26 250
Sex
Male 186 16 (62) 170 (68)
Female 90 10 (38) 80 (32) 0.509 -
Age (yr)
< 65 134 10 (38) 124 (50)
≥ 65 142 16 (62) 126 (50) 0.277 -
Tumor location
U 64 2 (8) 62 (25)
M and L 212 24 (92) 188 (75) 0.029 5.88 (1.61-38.1) 0.005
CA 19-9 (U/mL)
< 10 132 9 (35) 123 (49)
≥ 10 144 17 (65) 127 (51) 0.153 -
CEA (ng/mL)
< 3 195 16 (62) 179 (72)
≥ 3 81 10 (38) 71 (28) 0.295 -
Histopathological type
Differentiated 135 10 (38) 125 (50)
Undifferentiated 141 16 (62) 125 (50) 0.260 -
Venous invasion
(-) 173 12 (46) 161 (64)
(+) 103 14 (54) 89 (36) 0.072 -
Lymphatic invasion
(-) 105 3 (12) 102 (42)
(+) 171 23 (88) 148 (58) 0.002 -
Tumor size (mm)
< 45 119 5 (19) 114 (46)
≥ 45 157 21 (81) 136 (54) 0.007 -
T category
T1 and T2 127 3 (12) 124 (50)
T3 and T4 149 23 (88) 126 (50) < 0.0001 4.45 (1.28-21.3) 0.017

HDLN: Hepatoduodenal lymph node; CEA: Carcinoembryonic antigen; CA 19-9: Carbohydrate antigen 19-9; U: Upper gastric body; M: Middle gastric body; L: Lower gastric body.