Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomech. 2015 Aug 28;48(13):3634–3642. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.08.011

Table 2.

The slopes of the Ratio ((VL−VUL)/VUL) vs. strains with correlation r-values at the meniscus-covered and uncovered areas

Sub-tissue Zone 8wk-Contralateral
8wk-OA
12wk-Contralateral
12wk-OA
Slope r-value Slope r-value Slope r-value Slope r-value
T2(0°) Ratio vs. Strains-Covered
Bulk −0.544 0.331 a −0.081 0.321 a −1.162 0.296 b −0.840 0.103 c
SZ −0.651 0.751 a −1.685 0.654 a −2.139 0.447 b −2.960 0.322 b
TZ −0.958 0.581 a −0.745 0.759 a −1.554 0.455 a −1.207 0.032 c
RZ1 −0.366 0.400 a −0.433 0.640 a −1.484 0.423 b −0.859 0.523 a
RZ2 −0.474 0.467 a −0.229 0.389 a −0.563 0.151 c −0.785 0.369 b
T2(0°) Ratio vs. Strains -Uncovered
Bulk 0.728 0.167 a 0.392 0.542 a −0.141 0.667 a −0.615 0.291 b
SZ −1.401 0.544 a −1.228 0.804 a −1.336 0.425 b −2.435 0.155 c
TZ −0.615 0.403 b −0.528 0.691 a −0.776 0.944 a −0.808 0.100 c
RZ1 0.707 0.310 b −0.294 0.268 b −0.387 0.501 a −0.713 0.136 c
RZ2 0.402 0.455 a 0.042 0.108 c 0.025 0.319 b −0.287 0.237 c
T2(55°) Ratio vs. Strains -Covered
Bulk −0.954 0.681 a −0.456 0.356 a −0.937 0.641 a −0.341 0.291 a
SZ −1.852 0.523 a −1.656 0.462 a −1.354 0.969 a −2.207 0.923 a
TZ −1.161 0.790 a −0.823 0.555 a −0.965 0.984 a −0.978 0.229 c
RZ1 −0.746 0.530 a −0.119 0.250 b −0.742 0.940 a −0.534 0.108 c
RZ2 −0.959 0.294 a −0.386 0.043 c −0.764 0.930 a −0.004 0.442 b
T2(55°) Ratio vs. Strains -Uncovered
Bulk −1.140 0.824 a −1.254 0.820 a −0.130 0.186 c −0.488 0.171 c
SZ −1.526 0.671 a −1.554 0.688 a −2.088 0.339 b −1.474 0.124 c
TZ −1.557 0.956 a −1.173 0.694 a −0.619 0.147 c −0.307 0.305 c
RZ1 −1.676 0.832 a −1.474 0.789 a −0.164 0.282 c −0.476 0.065 c
RZ2 −0.428 0.271 b −1.290 0.734 a 0.188 0.245 c −0.025 0.702 a
Relative Thickness Ratio vs. Strains -Covered
SZ 2.714 0.124 c 2.459 0.080 c 1.735 0.384 c 6.256 −0.139 c
TZ 1.630 0.675 b 1.609 0.109 c 2.463 0.627 c 0.824 0.094 c
RZ1 −0.336 −0.586 b −0.022 0.160 c −0.545 −0.600 c −0.477 −0.194 c
RZ2 −0.470 −0.508 c −0.440 −0.472 c −0.466 −0.358 c −0.430 −0.080 c
Relative Thickness Ratio vs. Strains -Uncovered
SZ 3.804 0.837 a 2.497 0.393 c 4.386 0.202 c 5.145 −0.085 c
TZ 2.319 0.837 b 5.048 0.035 c 1.455 0.043 c 1.403 0.145 c
RZ1 −0.494 −0.930 b −0.578 −0.041 c −0.226 −0.323 c −0.239 −0.222 c
RZ2 −0.524 −0.830 c −0.619 0.103 c −0.291 0.100 c −0.198 −0.037 c

The significances of the correlation were indicated by the superscript letter:

a

P<0.001,

b

p<0.05,

c

p>0.05.