TABLE 1.
Comparison of Dynamic Joint Excursion Between Repaired, Contralateral, and Control Shoulders
Rotator Cuff Patients |
Control Participants |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Repaired Shoulder | Contralateral Shoulder | P | Dominant Shoulder | Pa | |
Anterior/posterior contact center range (% of glenoid width) | |||||
3 mo | 10.0 ± 6.2 | 9.2 ± 5.0 | .91 | 7.3 ± 4.5 | .01 |
12 mo | 12.7 ± 8.2b | 10.2 ± 5.6 | .13 | ||
24 mo | 11.7 ± 6.4c | 10.3 ± 5.5 | .38 | ||
Superior/inferior contact center range (% of glenoid height) | |||||
3 mo | 13.1 ± 10.9 | 13.3 ± 7.0 | .48 | 13.6 ± 8.2 | .58 |
12 mo | 13.1 ± 7.3 | 14.4 ± 5.7 | .79 | ||
24 mo | 12.3 ± 6.8 | 14.0 ± 6.2 | .55 | ||
Contact center path length (% of glenoid height) | |||||
3 mo | 20.8 ± 12.5 | 23.0 ± 7.1 | .19 | 21.5 ± 10.4 | .85 |
12 mo | 25.4 ± 9.8b | 24.5 ± 6.7 | .70 | ||
24 mo | 22.2 ± 8.0 | 24.7 ± 7.3 | .30 |
Control shoulders compared with repaired shoulders at 24 months after surgery.
Significantly different compared with 3 months after surgery (P < .05).
Statistical trend compared with 3 months after surgery (P = .07).