Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 12.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul 7;39(10):2117–2129. doi: 10.1177/0363546511412164

TABLE 1.

Comparison of Dynamic Joint Excursion Between Repaired, Contralateral, and Control Shoulders

Rotator Cuff Patients
Control Participants
Repaired Shoulder Contralateral Shoulder P Dominant Shoulder Pa
Anterior/posterior contact center range (% of glenoid width)
 3 mo 10.0 ± 6.2 9.2 ± 5.0 .91 7.3 ± 4.5 .01
 12 mo 12.7 ± 8.2b 10.2 ± 5.6 .13
 24 mo 11.7 ± 6.4c 10.3 ± 5.5 .38
Superior/inferior contact center range (% of glenoid height)
 3 mo 13.1 ± 10.9 13.3 ± 7.0 .48 13.6 ± 8.2 .58
 12 mo 13.1 ± 7.3 14.4 ± 5.7 .79
 24 mo 12.3 ± 6.8 14.0 ± 6.2 .55
Contact center path length (% of glenoid height)
 3 mo 20.8 ± 12.5 23.0 ± 7.1 .19 21.5 ± 10.4 .85
 12 mo 25.4 ± 9.8b 24.5 ± 6.7 .70
 24 mo 22.2 ± 8.0 24.7 ± 7.3 .30
a

Control shoulders compared with repaired shoulders at 24 months after surgery.

b

Significantly different compared with 3 months after surgery (P < .05).

c

Statistical trend compared with 3 months after surgery (P = .07).