Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 7;36(5):1233–1243. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2339

Table II.

DNA concentration.

Sample no. Institute A (ng/µl) Institute B (ng/µl) Institute C (ng/µl)
1 31 362.9 20.8
2 2.9 7.84 0.85
3 3.32 109.16 7.81
4 0.1 4.03 0.41
5 12.8 186.49 11.7
6 7.5 14.92 1.15
7 16.6 374.76 4.55
8 2.44 24.24 1.48
9 26.6 504.4 44.8
10 0.1 3.61 <0.5
11 10.3 26.1 3.42
12 5.7 266.83 2.36
13 8.06 11.58 2.94
14 4.56 21.62 1.18
15 2.06 28.72 4.94
16 2.7 15.64 1.25
17 1.29 25.68 3.58
18 3.78 17.32 1.99
19 0.1 19.24 4.3
20 8.8 204.08 1.3
21 0.1 1.3 0.1
22 18.4 470.92 12.2
23 0.83 204.61 6.08
24 0.97 52.5 5.34
25 0.16 103.01 2.85
26 0.3 103.01 8.52
27 0.24 60.02 1.31
28 0.1 85.57 1.06
29 0.1 47.74 0.7
30 0.1 56.77 4.2

DNA extraction from 30 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) samples was carried out with three different DNA extraction systems from Qiagen: BioRobot M48, QIA Symphony SP as well as manual extraction. After the extraction, concentration was measured with the Qubit 2.0 fluorometer in institutes A and C, or with the NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer in institute B.