| Structural |
• The organizational structure of the department was composed in an ad hoc manner based on the academic physicians who were available. |
• Restructure the department to ensure that the academic workload is split equitably. |
|
• Single academics hold multiple positions. |
• Reduce the administrative, clinical, and educational workload of researchers in the group. |
|
• The research funding that is available is largely utilized by senior researchers. |
• Support a mentorship programme to foster relationships between residents and senior research staff. |
|
|
• Modify the system for distributing resources to ensure that junior researchers receive monetary support for their projects. |
| Human resources |
• Residents are interested in medical education but there are few faculty trained in this area. |
• Recruit faculty with expertise in medical education. |
|
• There are no non-physician researchers associated with the department and very few non-physician collaborators. |
• Hire a non-physician research associate to support resident research and/or establish co-mentorship models with other university departments. |
|
• Many of the clinicians hired by the department have no interest in scholarly pursuits. |
• Empower junior researchers within the department by supporting their professional development. |
|
|
• Modify hiring criteria for residents and physician staff to ensure that interests in scholarly pursuits is prioritized. |
| Political |
• The department has few relationships with other parts of the organization. |
• Develop a collaborative relationship with the institution’s research groups and other departments. |
|
• The department does not devote a substantive portion of its funds to support scholarly pursuit. |
• Consider likely allies and opponents for the proposed changes and meet with them to define and address concerns. |
|
• Few faculty are interested in financially supporting scholarly pursuits. |
• Meet with upper administration and request aid and resources for the development of a department that is scholarship-focussed. |
|
• Department leadership is supportive of the goal of increasing scholarship but has not taken concrete action to support it. |
|
| Symbolic |
• Scholarly achievement is not celebrated. |
• Develop rewards and incentives that encourage participation in scholarly pursuits. |
|
• Some group values (e.g. family, clinical care, financial success) can be construed to contradict prioritizing scholarship. |
• Bring together members of the department to develop a shared vision and mission statement. |
|
• The residency programme does not have a strong scholarly tradition. |
• Prominently feature scholarly successes of department members in appropriate forums. Assist in disseminating research using the institution’s resources. |