Table 2.
Host diversity and temporal diversity of the eight most frequently detected lineages in Xiaolongmen Forest Park
| Lineage | Genus | Host diversity | Temporal diversity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Host speciesa (sample size) | S H | Sampled year (sample size) | T S | ||
| EMEL02 | Plasmodium | Emel (1), Pamo (4), Pave (1) | 1.25 | 2009 (1), 2010 (1), 2011 (1), 2012 (1), 2013 (2) | 2.25 |
| EMEL01 | Plasmodium | Pama (3), Pamo (5), Pave (4), Emel (5), Emgo (3), Sieu (6), Papa (5) | 2.77 | 2009 (25), 2011 (5), 2012 (1) | 0.83 |
| PHPR01 | Plasmodium | Phpr (1)¸Tacy (4) | 0.72 | 2009 (3), 2012 (2) | 0.97 |
| ANHO02 | Plasmodium | Tacy (5) | 0 | 2009 (4), 2011 (1) | 0.72 |
| AECA03 | Haemoproteus | Pama (1), Tacy (9), Emel (1), Aeca (1) | 1.21 | 2009 (5), 2012 (7) | 0.98 |
| EMEL03 | Haemoproteus | Phin (2), Emel (7), Emgo (1), Fiel (1), Pama (2), Pamo (4) | 2.51 | 2011 (2), 2013 (15) | 0.59 |
| ACAE01 | Haemoproteus | Pama (5), Pamo (2), Tacy (1), Pave (2), Emel (1), Phpr (3), Sieu (3), Aeca (1) | 2.77 | 2009 (3), 2010 (3), 2011 (3), 2012 (2), 2013 (7) | 2.17 |
| PHPR05 | Leucocytozoon | Phpr (3), Tacy (1) | 0.81 | 2011 (2), 2013 (2) | 1.00 |
S H host species diversity index, T S temporal sampling diversity index
aSpecies codes correspond to species names in Table S1