Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 13;6:1114. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01114

Table 3.

Relative abundances of the most abundant bacterial genera detected in this study.

GZ
SWH
Genus Inoculum Cellulose Cellulose (55°C) Food waste Xylan Xylose Inoculum Cellulose Cellulose (55°C) Food waste Xylan Xylose
Anaerobaculum 54 0.11
Geobacter 2.7 19 12 5.0 6.8 17 0.024
Thermacetogenium 8.8 0.36
Clostridium 0.94 2.4 8.5 5.6 43 22 0.57 55 0.12 54 3.1 73
Coprothermobacter 4.7
Desulfovibrio 0.085 2.6 2.4 2.8 0.8 0.37 1.9
Limnohabitans 1.1
T78 0.26 10 2.1 2.5 5.3 2.2
vadinCA02 0.35 4.4 0.17 0.3 0.33 0.14
SHD-231 0.17 3.9 0.43 0.43 0.16 0.41
Ethanoligenens 2.0 0.15 0.088
Pelotomaculum 0.43 0.18 0.2 0.22 3.0 0.16 0.22
Rhodobacter 1.2
Syntrophobacter 2.0 13 12 3.0 4.6 0.31 0.27 11 0.072
Syntrophomonas 1.8 0.94 1.5 1.3 8.0 0.73 0.086 2.0 0.77 0.12
Kosmotoga 0.77 1.1 0.3 0.6 2.6 3.7 0.88
Syntrophus 0.34 1.0 3.2 0.27 0.44 0.082 0.057 0.44 0.58
Treponema 0.43 0.059 0.2 0.32 2.0 0.057 0.33 0.22

All genera with a relative abundance of at least 1% in one sample are included. Genera are given in descending order of their mean relative abundance across all samples. A dash indicates that no OTUs associated with the genus were detected. Note that the Greengenes taxonomy includes some candidate and uncultured divisions.