Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Aging Health. 2015 Mar 24;27(7):1199–1222. doi: 10.1177/0898264315577590

Table 4.

Differentiating Between Normal and ILMTB.

Composite subtest Composite domains Learning and retention
AUC 0.76 [0.72, 0.80] 0.80 [0.76, 0.83] 0.78 [0.74, 0.81]
Cutoff 0.17 0.21 0.15
Sensitivity 0.72 [0.67, 0.78] 0.74 [0.68, 0.79] 0.71 [0.65, 0.76]
Specificity 0.69 [0.65, 0.73] 0.74 [0.70, 0.77] 0.75 [0.71, 0.78]
PPV 0.53 [0.47, 0.58] 0.57 [0.52, 0.62] 0.57 [0.52, 0.62]
NPV 0.84 [0.80, 0.87] 0.86 [0.82, 0.89] 0.84 [0.81, 0.87]
Test accuracy 0.70 [0.67, 0.73] 0.74 [0.71, 0.77] 0.73 [0.70, 0.76]

Note. AUC = area under the curve; PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value.

a

Significant difference compared with composite domains summary score.

b

Significant difference compared with learning and retention summary score.