Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Aging Health. 2015 Mar 24;27(7):1199–1222. doi: 10.1177/0898264315577590

Table 7.

Differentiating Between MDITB and Dementia Participants.

Composite subtest Composite domains Learning and retention
AUC 0.85 [0.73, 0.97] 0.86 [0.74, 0.98] 0.84 [0.74, 0.94]
Cutoff −0.70 −1.03 −1.14
Sensitivity 0.79 [0.54, 0.94] 0.79 [0.54, 0.94] 0.63 [0.38, 0.84]
Specificity 0.85 [0.81, 0.89] 0.89 [0.85, 0.92] 0.96 [0.94, 0.98]a,b
PPV 0.20 [0.12, 0.31] 0.25 [0.15, 0.38] 0.46 [0.27, 0.67]
NPV 0.99 [0.97, 1.00] 0.99 [0.97, 1.00] 0.98 [0.96, 0.99]
Test accuracy 0.85 [0.81, 0.88] 0.88 [0.85, 0.91] 0.95 [0.92, 0.97]a,b

Note. MDITB = test-based multidomain impairment; AUC = area under the curve; PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value.

a

Significant difference compared with composite domains summary score.

b

Significant difference compared with learning and retention summary score.