Table 8.
Differentiating Between ILMTB and MDITB Participants.
| Composite subtest | Composite domains | Learning and retention | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUC | 0.70 [0.67, 0.74]a,b | 0.62 [0.58, 0.67]b | 0.51 [0.46, 0.55] |
| Cutoff | −0.15 | −0.23 | −0.08 |
| Sensitivity | 0.62 [0.57, 0.67]b | 0.53 [0.48, 0.58] | 0.51 [0.46, 0.56] |
| Specificity | 0.69 [0.63, 0.74]b | 0.67 [0.61, 0.72]b | 0.54 [0.47, 0.60] |
| PPV | 0.75 [0.70, 0.79]b | 0.70 [0.65, 0.75]b | 0.62 [0.56, 0.67] |
| NPV | 0.55 [0.49, 0.60]b | 0.49 [0.44, 0.54]b | 0.42 [0.37, 0.48] |
| Test accuracy | 0.65 [0.61, 0.68]b | 0.59 [0.55, 0.62]b | 0.52 [0.48, 0.56] |
Note. ILMTB = test-based impaired learning and memory; MDITB = test-based multidomain impairment; AUC = area under the curve; PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value.
a
Significant difference compared with composite domains summary score.
b
Significant difference compared with learning and retention summary score.