Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 13.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Neurol. 2013 Sep 10;74(2):188–198. doi: 10.1002/ana.23921

Table 1.

Study group demographics

Prediction model cohort Validation cohort

CN (@baseline) MCI (@ 1st 11C-PiB PET imaging) MCI (@baseline)
N 46 62 153
Age, years 75.87 ± 5.38 74.24 ± 7.77 74.43 ± 7.52
Sex, % female 51% 32% 35%
Education, years 15.91 ± 2.22 16.26 ± 2.77 15.47 ± 3.00
ApoE- ε3/ε4 carriers, % 0% 42% 40%
ApoE- ε4/ε4 carriers, % 0% 11% 11%
MMSE 29.20 ± 0.92 26.98 ± 2.331 26.72 ± 1.861
CDR-SB 0.02 ± 0.10 2.24 ± 1.601 1.61 ± 0.921,2
ADAS-Cog 6.00 ± 3.08 11.11 ± 5.411 11.94 ± 4.531

Composite PiB-SUVR - 1.63 ± 0.29 -
% Aβ+ (i.e., Composite PiB-SUVR > 1.478) - 66% -

CSF Aβ1-42 243.00 ± 22.99 162.23 ± 54.071, 3 162.29 ± 53.831
% Aβ+ (i.e., CSF Aβ1-42 < 1929) 0% 76%3 73%
1

Two sample t-test group difference in comparison to CN at p<10−9 level

2

Two sample t-test group difference in comparison to prediction model MCI cohort at p=0.017 level

3

Based on 34 MCI subjects who had baseline CSF protein assay