Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 8;21:3028–3035. doi: 10.12659/MSM.894346

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies included in this meta-analysis.

Study Year Country Design Age (y) Gender (M/F) IDB TFTTR (m) Follow-up (m)
As Open As Open As Open As Open As Open
Sperber [31] 2001 Sweden Level I RCT 25 27.5 21/9 19/7 21 (70%) 11 (42%) 57.6 42 24
Fabbriciani [32] 2004 Italy Level I RCT 24.5 26.8 24/6 26/4 22 (73%) 17 (57%) 25.3 20.2 24
Bottoni [33] 2006 USA Level I RCT 25.3 25.2 30/1 29/0 27 (87%) 14 (48%) 40 35.1 29.1 28.5
Mohtadi [20] 2014 Canada Level I RCT 27.2 27.8 80/18 80/18 31 (32%) 45 (46%) 54 75 24
Cole [13] 2000 USA Prospective 28 27 33/4 18/4 18 (49%) 8 (36%) 35 47 52 55
Karlsson [34] 2001 Sweden Prospective 26 27 45/15 38/10 N/A N/A 31 42 28 36
Kim [35] 2002 South Korea Retrospective 19.5 20.3 50/8 26/4 N/A N/A 58.8 69.6 39
Tjoumakaris [36] 2005 USA Retrospective 30.8 28 48/11 16/8 34 (58%) 12 (50%) >12 >12 40 56
Lützner [37] 2009 Germany Retrospective 25 27 35/5 124/35 109 (55%) 32 21 31
Mahiroğulları [38] 2010 Turkey Retrospective 24.9 25.8 34M 30M 23 (68%) 27 (90%) 45.6 52.8 26.1 26.6
Zaffagnini [22] 2012 Italy Retrospective 35 38 N/A N/A 30 (61%) 19 (58%) N/A N/A 164.4 188.4

As – arthroscopic; M – male; F – female; IDB – involved dominant shoulder; TFTTR – time from trauma to repair; N/A – not applicable.