Table 4.
Genetic model | Genotype | Invasive | Superficial | Logistic regressiona | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n = 84 | n = 75 | OR (95 % CI) | P | ||
mir-196a2 rs11614913 C/T | |||||
Codominant | T/T | 27 (32.1 %) | 25 (33.3 %) | 1 | 0.68 |
C/T | 33 (39.3 %) | 33 (44 %) | 0.63 (0.21–1.86) | ||
C/C | 24 (28.6 %) | 17 (22.7 %) | 1.45 (0.43–5.00) | ||
Dominant | T/T | 27 (32.1 %) | 25 (33.3 %) | 1 | 0.39 |
C/T-C/C | 57 (67.9 %) | 50 (66.7 %) | 0.65 (0.24–1.74) | ||
Recessive | T/T-C/T | 60 (71.4 %) | 58 (77.3 %) | 1 | 0.83 |
C/C | 24 (28.6 %) | 17 (22.7 %) | 1.12 (0.39–3.23) | ||
Overdominant | T/T-C/C | 51 (60.7 %) | 42 (56 %) | 1 | 0.52 |
C/T | 33 (39.3 %) | 33 (44 %) | 0.74 (0.28–1.91) | ||
Log-additive | — | — | — | 0.82 (0.45–1.49) | 0.51 |
mir-499 rs3746444 G/A | |||||
Codominant | A/A | 52 (61.9 %) | 55 (73.3 %) | 1 | 0.25 |
G/A | 28 (33.3 %) | 17 (22.7 %) | 1.96 (0.67–5.88) | ||
G/G | 4 (4.8 %) | 3 (4 %) | 3.70 (0.50–25.00) | ||
Dominant | A/A | 52 (61.9 %) | 55 (73.3 %) | 1 | 0.12 |
G/A-G/G | 32 (38.1 %) | 20 (26.7 %) | 2.22 (0.81–5.88) | ||
Recessive | A/A-A/A | 80 (95.2 %) | 72 (96 %) | 1 | 0.26 |
G/G | 4 (4.8 %) | 3 (4 %) | 3.13 (0.44–25.00) | ||
Overdominant | A/A-G/G | 56 (66.7 %) | 58 (77.3 %) | 1 | 0.27 |
G/A | 28 (33.3 %) | 17 (22.7 %) | 1.82 (0.63–0.92) | ||
Log-additive | — | — | — | 0.51 (0.23–1.13) | 0.094 |
mir146a rs2910164 C/G | |||||
Codominant | C/C | 30 (35.7 %) | 30 (40 %) | 1 | 0.034 |
C/G | 45 (53.6 %) | 28 (37.3 %) | 1.41 (0.50–4.00) | ||
G/G | 9 (10.7 %) | 17 (22.7 %) | 0.24 (0.06–1.01) | ||
Dominant | C/C | 30 (35.7 %) | 30 (40 %) | 1 | 0.84 |
C/G-G/G | 54 (64.3 %) | 45 (60 %) | 1.11 (0.42–2.89) | ||
Recessive | C/C-C/G | 75 (89.3 %) | 58 (77.3 %) | 1 | 0.012 |
G/G | 9 (10.7 %) | 17 (22.7 %) | 0.20 (0.05–0.72) | ||
Overdominant | C/C-G/G | 39 (46.4 %) | 47 (62.7 %) | 1 | 0.097 |
C/G | 45 (53.6 %) | 28 (37.3 %) | 2.17 (0.86–5.56) | ||
Log-additive | — | — | — | 1.66 (0.84–3.31) | 0.14 |
aAdjusted by gender, age, smoking status, tumor stage, recurrence, and metastasis. Italicized values indicated a significant difference at the 5 % level
n number of individuals