Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2015 Jul 22;121:78–90. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.040

Table 2.

Summary of statistical results for pattern analyses on learned and “Random” sequences in individual cortical and subcortical ROIs.

Cortical ROIs Contrasts
Between learned sequences Random sequence All learned sequences vs. Random sequence
“same pos.” vs. “lag 2+” “same pos.” vs. “lag 2+” “same obj.” vs. “different obj.” “same obj.+pos.” vs. “same pos.” “same obj.+pos.” vs. “same obj.”
Medial PFC
R. p < 0.001**** p > 0.335 p > 0.946 p > 0.277 p > 0.060
L. p < 0.005*** p > 0.064 p > 0.900 p > 0.888 p < 0.035*
RSC
R. p < 0.005*** p < 0.016* p > 0.751 p > 0.900 p > 0.600
L. p > 0.171 p > 0.235 p > 0.652 p > 0.990 p > 0.809
ANG
R. p < 0.001**** p > 0.148 p < 0.018* p > 0.986 p > 0.735
L. p < 0.001**** p > 0.059 p > 0.686 p > 0.995 p > 0.072
Striatal ROIs
Caudate
R. p > 0.300 p > 0.844 p > 0.500 p > 0.192 p > 0.395
L. p > 0.209 p > 0.708 p < 0.029* p > 0.124 p > 0.534
Putamen
R. p > 0.331 p > 0.900 p > 0.900 p < 0.041* p < 0.005***
L. p > 0.066 p > 0.724 p > 0.981 p > 0.203 p < 0.029*
****

p < 0.001

***

p < 0.005

**p < 0.01

*

p < 0.05

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure