Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Sep 11;21(11):1883–1887. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.09.005

Table 2.

Selected reports of HCT outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis [33]

Reference Timeline
of HCT
N Median
age
(range),
years
Conditioning
regimen
% of
patients
with
RIC
NRM PFS OS Comment
Rondelli [34] NR 21 54 (27–68) Multiple 100 10% at 1 y 81% at 2.7 y 85% at 2.7 y Extensive cGVHD in 44%; 2 patients needed DLI for 100% donor chimerism; resolution of fibrosis and splenomegaly in majority
Kerbauy [35] NR 104 49 (18–70) Multiple, Bu/Cy (62%) 9 35% at 5 y NR 61% at 5 y 3 syngeneic donors, 54 of the patients overlapped with a prior report10; targeted Bu improved OS; comorbidity score had impact on survival
Patriarca [36] 1986–2006 100 49 (21–68) Multiple, Bu/Cy 50% of full intensity; Thiotepa + Cy in 46% of RIC 52 43% at 3 y 35% at 3 y 42% at 3 y AHCT before 1995; unrelated donor and longer interval from diagnosis predicted worse outcome but not conditioning intensity; relapse at 2 y 41%, progressive decline in NRM over 20 y studied
Kroger [9] 2002–2007 103 55 (32–68) Flu-Bu (100%) 100 16% at 1 y 51% at 5 y 67% at 5 y First prospective study in MF, cGVHD in 43%; 12% NRM for fully matched donor AHCT; age > 55 y and HLA mismatch adversely affected OS; JAK2-positive recipients had better EFS and OS; splenectomy increased risk of relapse
Ballen [10] 1989–2002 289 47 (18–73) Multiple, Bu/Cy (43%) 21 35% siblings 50% for URD at 5 y 33% siblings 27% for URD at 5 y 37% siblings 30% for URD at 5 y Relapse at 5 y, 32% in sibling and 23% in URD; performance status, peripheral blasts sibling donor status impacted OS; RIC was similar in outcomes, except early NRM
Alchalby [31] 1999–2009 162 56 (32–73) Flu-Bu in 96% 100 22% at 1 y 46% at 5 y 62% at 5 y 82 patients reported previously54; age and HLA mismatch impacted NRM; 23% relapse at 3 y; clearance of mutated JAK2 at median of 96 days, and this reduced relapse risk
Bacigalupo [37] 1994–2007 46 51 (24–67) Thiotepa-Cy + melphalan 100 24% at 5 y NR 45% at 5 y A risk score based on transfusion history, spleen > 22 cm and alternative donor use predicted lower OS; no benefit for splenectomy
Robin [38] 1997–2008 147 53 (20–68) Multiple 69 39% at 4 y 32% at 4 y 39% at 4 y 19% patients had LT; poor outcome with mismatched donor
Samuelson [20] 1999–2007 30 65 (60–78) Multiple 63 13% at day 100 40% at 3 y 45% at 3 y Studied outcomes in patients ≥ 60 y, 7 patients had preceding LT
Ditschkowski [13] 1994–2010 76 50.5 (22–67) Multiple NR 36% at 5 y 50% at 5 y 53% at 5 y Significant high risk of relapse in patients without cGvHD; DIPSS was predictive of survival
Scott [16] 1990–2009 170 51.5 (12–78) Multiple NR 34% at 5 y 57% at 5 y 57% at 5 y Post-HCT success was dependent on pre-HCT DIPSS scores

MRD=HLA matched related donor; PFS = progression-free survival; OS = overall survival; TBI=, total body irradiation; Hb = hemoglobin; Bu= busulfan; Cy = cyclophosphamide; cGvHD= chronic GVHD; NR= not reported; DLI= donor lymphocyte infusion; AHCT= allogeneic HCT; PFS= event-free survival; NRM= non-relapse mortality; OS= overall survival; KPS= Karnofsky performance status; ATG= antithymocyte globulin.