Table 1. Relative abundance of Lactobcillus in rat caecum.

Groups	Relative abundance (%)	Median (%)	Range (%)
Chicken (n1 = 11)	46.41a	49.39	21.20–77.28
Fish (n = 11)	36.3ab	39.44	1.73–59.31
Beef (n = 11)	20.32bc	13.99	0.13–53.30
Pork (n = 11)	18.88c	14.38	2.72–72.37
Soybean (n = 10)	16.6c	7.6	1.75–55.65
Casein (n = 10)	9.45c	2.24	0.31–53.22

Note: The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and means were compared by Duncan’s multiple comparison.

¹‘n’ is the number of animals in each group. ^a,b,cMeans with different superscripts differed significantly (p < 0.05).