Table III.
Multivariate regression Models of Cognitive and behavioral impacts of health warning labels on sociodemographic and smoking-related variables, by Country and pooled
| Multivariate linear regression model of cognitive impact of HWLs
|
Multivariate logistic regression model of not smoking because of HWLs
|
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brazil B (SE) |
Uruguay B (SE) |
Mexico B (SE) |
Pooled1 B (SE) |
Pooled2 B (SE) |
Brazil OR (95%CI) |
Uruguay OR (95%CI) |
Mexico OR (95%CI) |
Pooled1 OR (95%CI) |
Pooled2 OR (95%CI) |
|
| Age | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.00 (0.00) | −0.01* (0.01) | 0.00* (0.01) | 0.01* (0.00)a | 0.00* (0.00) | 0.00* (0.00) |
|
| ||||||||||
| Education | −0.20 (0.03)c | −0.05 (0.03) | −0.01 (0.02) | −0.08 (0.01)c | −0.02 (0.02) | −0.29* (0.08)c | −0.22a* (0.10)a | −0.05* (0.07) | −0.17* (0.05)c | −0.08* (0.07) |
|
| ||||||||||
| Sex | −0.03 (0.06) | 0.06 (0.06) | −0.02 (0.04) | −0.01 (0.03) | −0.01 (0.03) | 0.84 (0.64, 1.11) | 1.22 (0.82, 1.83) | 0.92 (0.70, 1.21) | 0.98 (0.82, 1.17) | 0.97 (0.82, 1.16) |
|
| ||||||||||
| Daily vs. non-daily smoker | −0.18 (0.11) | −0.32 (0.11)b | −0.22 (0.05)c | −0.22 (0.04)c | −0.23 (0.04)c | 0.69 (0.40, 1.16) | 0.45 (0.25, 0.80)b | 0.74 (0.56, 0.99)a | 0.7 (0.55, 0.89)b | 0.7 (0.55, 0.89)b |
|
| ||||||||||
| Smoking has harmed some vs. none | 0.18 (0.09)a | 0.01 (0.07) | 0.09 (0.05) | 0.08 (0.04)a | 0.1 (0.04)b | 1.36 (0.86, 2.15) | 0.97 (0.59, 1.60) | 1.37 (0.98, 1.93) | 1.28 (1.01, 1.63)a | 1.29 (1.02, 1.64)a |
|
| ||||||||||
| Smoking has harmed a lot vs. none | 0.30 (0.10)b | 0.30 (0.08)c | 0.26 (0.07)c | 0.29 (0.04)c | 0.29 (0.04)c | 1.69 (1.06, 2.70)a | 1.06 (0.60, 1.86) | 1.39 (0.94, 2.07) | 1.43 (1.11, 1.86)b | 1.43 (1.11, 1.86)b |
|
| ||||||||||
| Smoking will harm some vs. none | 0.47 (0.13)c | 0.39 (0.06)c | 0.10 (0.08) | 0.31 (0.05)c | 0.31 (0.05)c | 1.50 (0.76, 2.97) | 2.38 (1.09, 5.20)a | 1.41 (0.81, 2.47) | 1.68 (1.15, 2.45)b | 1.69 (1.16,2.46)b |
|
| ||||||||||
| Smoking will harma lot vs. none | 1.15 (0.13)c | 0.75 (0.07)c | 0.35 (0.08)c | 0.73 (0.05)c | 0.71 (0.05)c | 3.56 (1.82, 6.97)c | 5.12 (2.43, 10.79)c | 1.43 (0.83, 2.49) | 2.65 (1.83, 3.83)c | 2.63 (1.82, 3.81)c |
|
| ||||||||||
| Uruguay vs Mexico | −0.09 (0.04)a | −0.03 (0.06) | 0.65 (0.50, 0.83)c | 0.74 (0.51, 1.09) | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Brazil vs Mexico | 0.80 (0.04)c | 1.13 (0.07)c | 2.01 (1.62, 2.49)c | 2.79 (1.94, 3.99) c | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Uruguay* Education | −0.04 (0.03) | 0.89 (0.70, 1.13) | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Brazil* Education | −0.20 (0.04)c | 0.81 (0.67, 0.98)a | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| N | 1 183 | 1 146 | 1 692 | 4008 | 4008 | 1193 | 1158 | 1 705 | 4 056 | 4056 |
Estimates shown for age and education are beta coefficients, not odds ratios, and thus, the value of an age or education coefficient under the null hypothesis is 0, not 1
p<0.01;
p<0.05;
p<0.001