Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 14.
Published in final edited form as: Fertil Steril. 2014 Mar 14;101(5):1308–1314. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.050

Table 2.

Comparison of characteristics and outcomes of conventional and delayed start COS cycles

Conventional Start
(n=9)
Delayed Start
(n=9)
Between-group
difference (95%
confidence interval)
p
value
Days of ovarian stimulation 11.1 ± 2.0 9.4 ± 1.4 − 1.7 (−3.1, −0.3) 0.024
Total dose of gonadotropins (IU) 5000 ± 884 4250 ± 641 −750 (−1374, −126) 0.024
Endometrial thickness (mm) 9.5 ± 2.2 10.9 ± 2.5 1.4 (−0.2, 3.1) 0.082
Follicles ≥ 13 mm 3.9 ± 1.3 6.7 ± 2.2 2.8 (1.3, 4.3) 0.002
Oocytes retrieved 4.3 ± 1.8 6.6 ± 2.6 2.3 (0.13, 4.3) 0.04
Mature oocytes (MII) retrieved 2.2 ± 1.1 4.9 ± 2.0 2.7 (1.1, 4.2) 0.004
MII oocyte / total oocytes ratio 0.53 ± 0.20 0.73 ± 0.10 0.20 (0.01, 0.4) 0.041
Oocyte / AFC ratio 0.76 ± 0.36 1.13 ± 0.21 0.37 (0.06, 0.68) 0.024
Mature oocyte / AFC ratio 0.38 ± 0.19 0.86 ± 0.21 0.48 (0.24, 0.72) 0.003
Fertilization rate after ICSI (2PN/MII) 0.69 ± 0.21 0.86 ± 0.17 0.17 (−0.10, 0.44) 0.17
Day of transfer
Day 2 8 (100%)a 6 (67%)
Day 3 0 3 (33%)
Embryos Transferred 1.6 ± 1.2 3.4 ± 1.6 1.8 (0.5, 3.0) 0.013
Implantation Rate 0 6.5 %
Clinical Pregnancy Rate 0 2 (22.2%)
a

One patient did not have any viable oocyte at the time of retrieval