Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 22;6(10):4063–4078. doi: 10.1364/BOE.6.004063

Table 9. Performance comparison of two classical classifiers (for region A).

Subject LDA
(% accuracy/computation time, sec)
SVM
(% accuracy/computation time, sec)

Win size
0-5 sec
Win size
0-10 sec
Win size
0-15 sec
Win size
0-5 sec
Win size
0-10 sec
Win size
0-15 sec
1 78.8/ 0.06 80.4/ 0.03 82.1/ 0.02 80.3/ 1.2 83.3/ 0.7 84.3/ 0.4
2 91.5/ 0.04 91.8/ 0.04 94.5/ 0.03 92.2/ 0.5 93.0/ 0.4 94.2/ 0.3
3 86.8/ 0.05 88.7/ 0.03 89.5/ 0.03 88.6/ 0.7 90.1/ 0.4 91.3/ 0.3
4 85.9/ 0.06 87.0/ 0.03 89.8/ 0.02 85.9/ 1.4 87.0/ 0.8 89.8/ 0.3
5 74.6/ 0.06 76.1/ 0.04 79.4/ 0.02 75.5/ 0.9 77.7/ 0.6 83.6/ 0.5
6 78.0/ 0.05 79.2/ 0.03 80.7/ 0.02 78.8/ 0.9 80.1/ 0.5 81.9/ 0.4
7 85.6/ 0.06 85.9/ 0.03 86.4/ 0.02 88.4/ 1.6 89.2/ 0.9 90.8/ 0.6
8 91.3/ 0.04 90.1/0.03 90.4/ 0.02 93.1/ 0.7 93.8/ 0.4 94.7/ 0.3
9 78.8/ 0.06 77.9/ 0.04 79.0/ 0.02 79.0/ 0.8 79.8/ 0.4 80.1/ 0.2
10 82.2/ 0.04 82.8/ 0.03 83.6/ 0.02 83.4/ 0.8 84.6/ 0.5 85.6/ 0.3
11 73.6/ 0.06 74.5/ 0.04 73.2/ 0.03 75.8/ 1.0 77.4/ 0.6 78.9/ 0.4
12 85.0/ 0.05 86.4/ 0.03 85.8/ 0.02 87.4/ 0.8 88.3/ 0.5 89.4/ 0.3
13 88.6/ 0.05 88.4/ 0.03 89.4/ 0.02 89.1/ 0.9 90.3/ 0.5 91.0/ 0.3

Mean 83.1/ 0.05 83.4/ 0.03 84.9/ 0.02 84.4/ 0.9 85.7/ 0.6 87.3/ 0.4

Note: The accuracies were acquired using only three features (mean ∆HbO, signal peak, and sum of peaks).