Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov;105(11):2202–2209. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302673

TABLE 2—

Proportion of News Coverage Framing the Problem of Obesity and the Characteristics of the New York City Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Portion-Size Cap Regulation: May 31, 2012–July 31, 2013

Frame Topics Mentioned Overall % (n = 263) Before Board of Health Vote,a % (n = 133) After Board of Health Vote,b % (n = 130)
News stories framing the problem of obesity
 Obesity is a problem 60.5 60.9 60.0
 SSB consumption is a cause of obesity 27.4 31.6 23.1
 Role of the industry in contributing to SSB consumption or obesity 9.5 13.5 5.4*
 Role of individual choice, behavior, or lifestyles in contributing to SSB consumption or obesity 13.7 16.5 10.8
News stories framing characteristics of the SSB portion-size cap
 Aim of the policy is to improve health 53.6 49.6 57.7*
 Policy only includes certain types of beverages 28.9 24.8 33.1
 Policy only includes certain locations where SSBs are sold 37.6 30.8 44.6*
 Individuals can purchase refills or more than one 16-oz beverage 28.1 33.8 22.3
 NYC health department has considered or enacted other obesity-specific public health interventionsc 25.5 26.3 24.6
 NYC health department has considered or enacted other, non–obesity-specific public health interventionsd 22.4 23.3 21.5

Notes. NYC = New York City; SSB = sugar-sweetened beverage.

a

May 31, 2012, to Sep 13, 2012.

b

Sep 14, 2012, to Jul 31, 2013.

c

Other obesity-specific public health interventions include front-of-package labeling, menu labeling, trans-fat bans, and other food policies or programs.

d

Non–obesity-specific public health interventions include tobacco and alcohol policies and programs, such as smoke-free indoor air restrictions.

*P < .05 indicating frames in news stories that differ significantly across 2 time periods with control for news story word count and adjustment of standard errors for nonindependence of news outlets.