Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 14.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Behav Med. 2014 Aug;21(4):653–661. doi: 10.1007/s12529-013-9367-1

Table 1.

Characteristics of primary studies reviewed (n =15)

Author Study population Location Age (years) Random sample Response rate Questionnaire administration Sample size Smoking rate Validity score
Youths
 Zhang [31] Secondary school students Henan, China 10–19 Yes 97 %a Self 1,720 ES, 5.4 % 9
 Huang [34] Elementary school students Taiwan Mean=11 Yes 94 %a Self 1,137 ES, 9.2 % 7
 Ma [29] 9th grade students 7 cities in China Mean=15 Yes Not stated Self 1,768 Not stated 7
 Wen [30] High school students Taiwan 15–18 Not stated Not stated Self 22,821 CS, 5.1 % 6
Adults
 Chuang [32] General Taiwan 20+ Yes 67 %a Interviewer Not stated ES, 5 % 10
 Shin [26] Rural-to-urban migrants 10 provincial capital cities in China 18–30 No 99 % Interviewer 1,697 RHW, 532 SW ES: 18.4 % (RHW), 58.3 % (SW) CS: 3.2 % (RHW), 41.9 % (SW) 9
 Wan [27] Same as Shin [26] 8
 Yang [38] Aborigines Taiwan 17–50 Yes 89 % Interviewer 300 CS, 11.6 % 8
 Chen [28] Rural-to-urban migrants Beijing, China 18–30 Not stated Not stated Self 866 CS, 10.9 % 7
 Finch [18] Rural-to-urban migrants Beijing, China 18–30 No Not stated Interviewer 165 RHW, 72SW ES: 16.1 % (RHW), 54.9 % (SW) CS: 6.5 % (RHW), 33.3 % (SW) 7
 Ho [20] High school and college students 6 provincial capital cities in China 14–24 No 95 % Self 11,095 ES: 20.1 % (urban), 22.0 % (rural) CS: 4.2 % (urban), 1.9 % (rural) 7
 Lau [35] General Hong Kong 18+ Yes 75 % (smokers), 77 % (non-smokers) Telephone 2,024 ES, 3.4 % CS, 2.7 % 7
 Tsai [37] General Taiwan 18+ Yes 48 %a Interviewer 90 CS, 4.8 % 6
 Lin [36] Employees of microelectronics companies Taiwan 16–57 No 73 % Self 1,950 ES, 11.6 % CS, 9.3 % 6
 Cai [33] General 31 provinces in China 15+ Yes Not stated Interviewer 74,236 CS: 2.8 (urban), 2.6 (rural) 6

ES ever smoker, CS current smoker, RHW restaurant hotel workers, SW sex workers

a

Response rate of female/male combined samples, no female-specific response rate was reported