Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 14;10(10):e0140622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140622

Table 1. Comparisons of clinical and molecular features in AML patients with and without IDH1/2 mutations.

Variable IDH1/2 WT IDH1/2 mutations P-value
Age, median(range), yrs 47(14,82) 57(15,78) <0.001
Percent blast, median(range) 65(20,98) 73(20,97) 0.15
WBC, median(range),10^9/L 11(0.2,487) 14(0.4,262) 0.50
Female, n(%) 114(41) 32(38) 0.60
FAB classification, n(%) <0.001
M0 15(5) 18(21)
M1 19(7) 7(8)
M2 93(33) 29(34)
M4 56(20) 6(7)
M5 90(32) 22(26)
M6 6(2) 3(4)
Cytogenetic subtype, n(%) 0.04
Favorable 30(11) 2(2)
Intermediate 211(76) 70(82)
Adverse 38(14) 13(15)
Gene mutations, n(%)
FLT3ITD 41(15) 16(19) 0.36
NPM1 60(22) 29(34) 0.02
CEBPA DM 25(9) 2(2) 0.04
DNMT3a 29(10) 15(18) 0.07

WT: wild type; WBC: white blood cell counts; FAB: French-America-British; DM: double-allele.