Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2015 Aug 22;288(3):409–419. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2015.08.012

Figure 1. Echocardiography of Tat and METH mice.

Figure 1

Echocardiography was performed following 10 days of METH or saline vehicle in WT or Tat mice. Results identified no change in LV mass (A), LVEDD (B), or fractional shortening (C) that resulted from either Tat or METH. A small but significant increase in ejection fraction (D) was identified in METH-treated WT mice compared to WT-saline mice. A negative interaction between Tat and METH was identified by two-way ANOVA. * denotes p<0.05 compare to WT-saline mice by one-way ANOVA; # denotes a significant interaction (p<0.05) between Tat and METH by two-way ANOVA.