Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 30;2015:179156. doi: 10.1155/2015/179156

Table 1.

Reasons, resources, and methods used to disseminate the results of research in public health in Brazil, US, and UK %a (n).

Dissemination characteristics Brazil United Kingdom United States Total P value (χ 2)
Reasons to disseminateb
Raise awareness of the findings 92.1 (209) 93.1 (216) 94.4 (251) 93.2 (676) .598
Influence practice or policy 91.2 (207) 93.1 (216) 90.2 (240) 91.4 (663) .512
Influence practice 81.1 (184) 83.6 (194) 80.1 (213) 81.5 (591) .583
Influence policy 78.0 (177) 85.3 (198) 75.6 (201) 79.4 (576) .021
Stimulate discussion or debate 86.3 (196) 74.6 (173) 70.7 (188) 76.8 (557) <.01
Attract future funding 52.4 (119) 62.5 (145) 52.3 (139) 55.6 (403) .037
Raise the organizational profile 52.4 (119) 64.7 (150) 42.1 (112) 52.6 (381) <.01
Promote public understanding of science 47.1 (107) 40.1 (93) 57.9 (154) 48.8 (354) <.01
Justify public funding 60.4 (137) 48.3 (112) 39.1 (104) 48.7 (353) <.01
Satisfy grant/contractual obligations 15.0 (34) 36.6 (85) 41.4 (110) 31.6 (229) <.01
Improve your own communication 29.1 (66) 24.1 (56) 21.1 (56) 24.6 (178) .117

Importance of dissemination to nonresearch audiences
Importance to your own work
Very important 77.7 (171) 69.6 (160) 54.2 (143) 66.4 (474)
Important 19.5 (43) 24.3 (56) 24.2 (64) 22.8 (163)
Somewhat/not important/NS 2.7 (6) 6.1 (14) 21.6 (57) 10.8 (77) <.01
Importance to the work of your unit/department
Very important 75.9 (167) 65.7 (151) 37.7 (100) 58.5 (418)
Important 22.7 (50) 26.5 (61) 24.5 (65) 24.6 (176)
Somewhat/not important/IDK c 1.4 (3) 7.8 (18) 37.7 (100) 16.9 (121) <.01

Resources & structures for dissemination in unit/department
Formal communication/dissemination strategy or plan 27.8 (62) 20.2 (46) 31.8 (84) 26.9 (192) .014
Dedicated person or team responsible for dissemination-related activities 32.0 (71) 20.6 (47) 52.6 (140) 36.0 (258) <.01

Method of disseminationb
Academic journals 98.7 (224) 97.8 (227) 100.0 (266) 98.9 (717) .067
Academic conferences 91.6 (208) 96.1 (223) 92.5 (246) 93.4 (677) .117
Report to funders 79.7 (181) 91.4 (212) 68.0 (181) 79.2 (574) <.01
Seminars and/or workshops 69.2 (157) 71.1 (165) 60.9 (162) 66.8 (484) .035
Press releases 32.6 (74) 48.3 (112) 62.0 (165) 48.4 (351) <.01
Face to face meetings 49.8 (113) 40.1 (93) 53.4 (142) 48.0 (348) .01
Other conferences 21.6 (49) 55.2 (128) 42.5 (113) 40.0 (290) <.01
Media interviews 32.6 (74) 31.9 (74) 50.8 (135) 39.0 (283) <.01
Newsletters 13.7 (31) 39.2 (91) 45.1 (120) 33.4 (242) <.01
Email alerts 6.2 (14) 7.8 (18) 22.2 (59) 12.6 (91) <.01
Targeted mailings 3.1 (7) 16.4 (38) 16.2 (43) 12.1 (88) <.01

Designing for dissemination/processes/actions
Stage in the research process that dissemination-related activities are planned
Early 60.0 (132) 35.2 (80) 45.1 (120) 46.6 (332)
Late 36.8 (81) 64.8 (147) 39.1 (104) 46.6 (332)
Never 3.2 (7) 0.0 (0) 15.8 (42) 6.9 (49) <.01
Frequency that research summaries/key messages are written for specific nonresearch audiences
Always/usually 34.7 (76) 31.3 (71) 32.0 (85) 32.6 (232)
Sometimes 22.8 (50) 48.5 (110) 37.6 (100) 36.5 (260)
Rarely/never/NS 42.5 (93) 20.3 (46) 30.5 (81) 30.9 (220) <.01
Frequency the impact of your research is evaluated?
Always/usually 22.4 (49) 13.3 (30) 15.5 (41) 16.9 (120)
Sometimes/rarely 55.7 (122) 69.5 (157) 56.8 (150) 60.5 (429)
Never 19.2 (42) 17.3 (39) 26.5 (70) 21.3 (151)
Not sure 2.7 (6) 0.0 (0) 1.1 (3) 1.3 (9) <.01
Frequency that a framework/theory is used to plan dissemination-related activities
Always/usually 10.8 (24) 8.8 (20) 16.7 (44) 12.3 (88)
Sometimes/rarely 22.4 (50) 48.5 (110) 38.4 (101) 36.6 (261)
Never 60.1 (134) 39.6 (90) 25.9 (68) 41.0 (292)
Not sure 6.7 (15) 3.1 (7) 8.7 (23) 6.3 (45)
Do not plan dissemination activities 0.0 (0) 0.0 (0) 10.3 (27) 3.8 (27) <.01
Time dedicated to dissemination-related activities to nonresearch audiences.
 <5% 36.5 (80) 31.4 (71) 54.4 (143) 41.5 (294)
 5–20% 35.6 (78) 52.7 (119) 34.6 (91) 40.7 (288)
 >20% 27.9 (61) 15.9 (36) 11.0 (29) 17.8 (126) <.01

a% within local; bthose responding “yes”; cIDK = I do not know.