[Table/Fig-10]:
Comparison of the mode of origin of branches of coeliac trunk Lipshutz’s classification based on the sample size and percentage
| Author | No of specimen | Type I | Type II | Type III | Type IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rossi & Cova [15] | 55 | 48 (87.2%) | 6 (10.9%) | 0 | 1 (1.8%) |
| Descomps [3] | 50 | 37 (74%) | 5 (10%) | 3 (6%) | 4 (8%) |
| Rio Branco [16] | 50 | 28 (56%) | 16 (32%) | 0 | 5 (10%) |
| Lipschutz [7] | 50 | 30 (60%) | 15 (30%) | 3 (6%) | 1 (2%) |
| Eaton [6] | 83 | 41 (49.3%) | 21 (25.3%) | 3 (3.6%) | 12(14.4%) |
| Ambica Wadhwa [2] | 206 | 140 (67.9%) | 47 (22.8%) | 10 (4.8%) | 9 (4.4%) |
| Picquand [13] | 30 | 28 (93.3%) | 2 (6.65) | 0 | 0 |