Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 1;9(9):OC08–OC12. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14390.6450

[Table/Fig-2]:

Comparison of BMD in men and women between T2DM and controls

Men Women
Variable T2DM (n=67) Controls (n=63) p T2DM (n=83) Controls(n=87) p
Femoral Neck BMD (g/cm2) 0.7854 (±0.12) 0.8372 (±0.11) 0.0002 0.7574(±0.12) 0.8179(±0.13) 0.003
 Hip T score -1.818 (±1.33) -1.2626 (±1.12) 0.01 -1.34(±1.61) -0.8005(±1.02) 0.01
 Hip Z score -0.68 (±1.03) -0.82 (±.98) 0.4 -0.32(±1.1) -0.24(±0.97) 0.6
 Lumbar spine BMD (g/cm2) 0.8839 (±0.15) 0.8800 (±0.14) 0.8 0.8258(±0.17) 0.9129(±.15) 0.0007
 Lumbar spine T Score -1.48 (±1.15) -1.12 (±1.30) 0.09 -1.35(±1.36) -0.85(±1.32) 0.01
 Lumbar spine Z Score -1.02 (±1.21) -0.8744 (±1.02) 0.4 -0.74(±1.39) -0.32(±1.24) 0.03

Abbreviations- BMD, bone mineral density; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; Values are in mean ±SD