Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 1;9(9):ZC93–ZC97. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14641.6569

[Table/Fig-4]:

Comparison of staining and cellular characteristics of bone, teeth and soft tissue sections in decalcification by the three methods. (Fishers exact test)

TISSUE FEATURES ASSESSMENT CONVENTIONAL HEAT STIRRING FISHERS EXACT p-value
Count Column n % Count Column n % Count Column n %
BONE BONE MARROW CELL NUCLEAR DETAILS Poor 1 20 4 80 4 80 4.438 0.201
Average 4 80 1 20 1 20
Good 0 0 0 0 0 0
FOLDS Present 2 40 4 80 4 80 2.184 0.500
Absent 3 60 1 20 1 20
OSTEOCYTE RETRACTION Missing osteocytes 0 0 3 60 0 0 8.509 0.045
Intermediate 1 20 2 40 2 40
Minimum retraction 4 80 0 0 3 60
TOOTH PULP SHRINKAGE Present 2 4 2 40 3 60 0.709 1.000
Absent 3 60 3 60 2 40
PULP NUCLEAR CONTRAST Poor 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.087 0.021
Average 0 0 4 80 4 80
Good 5 100 1 20 1 20
ODONTOBLAST STATUS Missing 0 0 2 40 1 20 4.16 0.500
Intermediate 1 20 2 40 1 20
Distinct 4 80 1 20 3 60
SOFT TISSUE EOSINOPHILIA Weak 1 20 2 40 0 0 6.101 0.162
Moderate 1 20 2 40 0 0
Intense 3 60 1 20 5 100
NUCLEAR CONTRAST Poor 1 20 0 0 4 80 7.975 0.065
Average 3 60 3 60 0 0
Good 1 20 2 40 1 40
CHROMATIN Poor 5 100 3 60 2 40 4.187 0.251
Average to good 0 0 2 40 3 60