Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 15.
Published in final edited form as: Fam Relat. 2009 Dec 8;58(5):647–661. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2009.00581.x

Table 2.

Multinomial Logit Models Predicting Mothers’ Likelihood of Entering Cohabitation and Marriage between 1999 and 2000/01

MODEL 1 MODEL 2

Cohabiting vs. Remain Single Married vs. Remain Single Cohabiting vs. Remain Single Married vs. Remain Single

RRR Z Statistic RRR Z Statistic RRR Z Statistic RRR Z Statistic
Employment and Economic Characteristics
 Not employed 1.20 0.55 0.72 −0.69 1.05 0.10 0.36* −2.06
 Nonstandard schedule 0.72 −0.55 0.08* −2.23
 Perceived economic instability 0.72 −0.97 0.27* −2.01
 Male community employment rate 0.48 −0.35 0.48 −0.36
Caregiving Responsibilities
 Mother’s caregiving responsibility for disabled children or adult 0.71 −0.60 1.69 0.76 0.69 −0.65 1.85 0.75
 Number of children in the household 0.87 −1.15 1.43 1.82 0.87 −1.45 1.31 1.59
 Children under age 6 years in the household 1.59 1.14 0.29* −2.12 1.55 1.00 0.31* −2.40
 Access to enough child care support 0.50* −2.15 0.45 −1.60 0.49* −2.59 0.38 −1.60
Human Capital and Demographic Characteristics
 HS Diploma or GED 1.39 0.75 1.58 0.55 1.38 0.68 1.54 0.60
 Some or all of college/tech school 1.84 1.59 5.55* 2.18 1.83 1.45 5.32 1.87
 Woodcock-Johnson score at Wave 2 1.03*** 3.71 1.03** 2.77 1.03*** 4.24 1.03* 2.04
 Ongoing health problems 0.74 −0.73 0.06*** −4.40 0.78 −0.54 0.05*** −4.61
 Months on welfare in 2-year period up to wave 1 interview 0.99 −0.65 0.96 −1.59 0.99 −0.58 0.96 −1.63
 Mother and biological father previously married 1.00 −0.01 1.74 0.80 1.06 0.14 2.96 1.84
 Mother and biological father previously cohabit 1.88 1.79 1.71 0.89 1.86 1.74 1.63 0.83
 Age 0.90 −0.73 1.21 0.89 0.91 −1.04 1.29 1.28
 Age Squared 1.00 0.65 1.00 −1.21 1.00 0.9 0.99 −1.54
 Hispanic 2.05 1.88 1.44 0.90 2.19* 2.18 1.52 0.94
 Non-Hispanic White 1.98 1.26 1.75 0.85 2.34 1.16 2.23 1.46
 Lives in Boston 2.89** 2.68 0.35* −2.03 3.02*** 3.73 0.42* −2.00
 Lives in Chicago 1.89 1.20 1.52 0.93 1.93 1.47 1.94 1.45
N 1125 1123
Log Pseudolikelihood −581.35 −559.08

Note. In Model 2, standard errors are adjusted for clustering.

p < .10

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001 (two-tailed tests)