Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 14;15:695. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1685-z

Table 3.

Exposure to treatment for patients treated with either mFOLFOX-6 plus cetuximab (FOLFOX + Cmab) or XELOX plus cetuximab (XELOX + Cmab)

All (n = 62) FOLFOX + Cmab (n = 37) XELOX + Cmab (n = 25)
No. treatment cycles
 Median 10 (5.5–17.5) 10 (5–19) 9.5 (6–14)
Cetuximab treatment
 Cumulative dose (mg/m2) 6480 (2187–12 480) 6750 (3580–14 634) 6397 (4302–11 198)
 DI (mg/m2 per week) 216 (189–247) 223 (189–233) 237 (179–261)
 No. with relative DI >75 % 52 28 24
Oxaliplatin
 Cumulative dose (mg/m2) 992 (600–1812) 987 (505–2021) 1008 (661–1597)
 DI (mg/m2 per week) 31.4 (24–39) 30 (28–35) 39 (29–42)
 No. with relative DI >75 % 37 20 17
Bolus 5-FU
 Cumulative dose (mg/m2) 4392 (1795–9928)
 DI (mg/m2 per week) 135 (120–175)
 No. with relative DI >75 % 21
5-FU Infusion
 Cumulative dose (mg/m2) 28414 (14750–60644)
 DI (mg/m2 per week) 890 (803–1062)
 No. with relative DI >75 % 21
Capecitabine
 Cumulative dose (mg/m2) 23700 (14250–38925)
 DI (mg/m2 per week) 878 (666–978)
 No. with relative DI >75 % 16

Numbers in parenthesis show the interquartile range

DI dose intensity, 5-FU 5-fluorouraci