Table 3.
TB case management practices of private GPs in eight cities in Indonesia, 2011
| City | Ever treated a TB case in the past year | Prescribed regimen according to NTP guideline | Prescribed second-line drugs | Appointed treatment observer | Reported TB case to NTP | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%)a | 90 % CI | n (%)b | 90 % CI | n (%)b | 90 % CI | n (%)b | 90 % CI | n (%)b | 90 % CI | |
| Medan | 33 (47.8) | 37.9–57.7 | 24 (72.7) | 59.4–86.1 | 15 (45.5) | 30.5–60.4 | 14 (42.4) | 27.6–57.2 | 7 (21.2) | 8.9–33.5 |
| Palembang | 29 (34.1) | 25.6–42.6 | 22 (75.9) | 62.1–89.6 | 6 (20.7) | 7.7–33.7 | 13 (44.8) | 28.8–60.8 | 8 (27.6) | 13.2–41.9 |
| Banjarmasin | 14 (18.9) | 11.4–26.4 | 10 (71.4) | 49.2–93.6 | 4 (28.6) | 6.4–50.8 | 5 (35.7) | 12.2–59.2 | 4 (28.6) | 6.3–50.8 |
| Jakarta | 31 (66.0) | 54.6–77.7 | 27 (87.1) | 76.7–97.5 | 4 (12.9) | 2.5–23.3 | 7 (22.6) | 9.6–35.5 | 9 (29.0) | 14.9–43.1 |
| Bandung | 25 (48.1) | 36.6–59.5 | 21 (84.0) | 71.2–96.8 | 3 (12.0) | 0.6–23.3 | 13 (52.0) | 34.6–69.4 | 10 (40.0) | 22.9–57.1 |
| Semarang | 40 (44.4) | 35.8–53.1 | 21 (52.5) | 39.0–65.9 | 7 (17.5) | 7.2–27.8 | 10 (25.0) | 13.3–36.7 | 17 (42.5) | 29.2–55.8 |
| Surabaya | 29 (33.7) | 25.3–42.1 | 19 (65.5) | 50.2–80.7 | 8 (27.6) | 13.2–41.9 | 4 (13.8) | 2.7–24.9 | 8 (27.6) | 13.2–41.9 |
| Jayapura | 24 (54.5) | 42.2–66.9 | 19 (79.2) | 64.6–93.7 | 3 (12.5) | 0.6–24.3 | 9 (37.5) | 20.2–54.8 | 3 (12.5) | 0.7–24.3 |
NTP National Tuberculosis control Program
aDenominator: number of interviewed private GPs (see Table 1)
bDenominator: number of GPs who ever treated TB cases