Table 2.
Facility/Group | No. of offspring | Potential dams | Potential sires | No of loci genotyped | Average % missing gts | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1/1 | 2 | 1 known | 2 | 164 | 0.51 | All resolved |
1/2 | 2 | 1 known | 2 | 164 | 0.61 | All resolved |
1/3 | 4 | 1 known | 4 | 164 | 0.60 | One unresolved- two sires possible |
1/4 | 4 | 1 known | 5 | 164 | 0.60 | All resolved |
1/5 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 164 | 0.52 | One unresolved- two dams and two sires possible |
1/6 | 4 | 1 known | 4 | 164 | 0.70 | All resolved |
2/1 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 192 | 0.22 | Exclusions only- full-sibs and half sibs amongst candidate parents, 1 dam failed genotyping |
2/2 | 13 | 5 known | 8 | 192 | 0.24 | Exclusions only- half-sibs amongst candidate sires, no sample for 1 known dam |
3/1 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 192 | 0.29 | Exclusions only- full- and half-sibs amongst candidate sires |
4/1 | 6 | 3 | 12 | 192 | 0.26 | Exclusions only- half-sibs amongst candidate sires and no sample for one candidate dam |
5/1 | 11 | 8 | 6 | 192 | 0.28 | Exclusions only- half-sibs amongst candidate parents |
Nb. Number of loci differ as trios from breeding facility 1 were genotyped in the first sequencing run whereas trios from breeding facilities 2–5 were sequenced in runs 2, 3 and 4 with a refined marker set. Known dams are according to information provided from studbook management