Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 14;16:791. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2020-4

Table 2.

Pedigree results for all genotyped offspring

Facility/Group No. of offspring Potential dams Potential sires No of loci genotyped Average % missing gts Comments
1/1 2 1 known 2 164 0.51 All resolved
1/2 2 1 known 2 164 0.61 All resolved
1/3 4 1 known 4 164 0.60 One unresolved- two sires possible
1/4 4 1 known 5 164 0.60 All resolved
1/5 7 4 4 164 0.52 One unresolved- two dams and two sires possible
1/6 4 1 known 4 164 0.70 All resolved
2/1 8 5 8 192 0.22 Exclusions only- full-sibs and half sibs amongst candidate parents, 1 dam failed genotyping
2/2 13 5 known 8 192 0.24 Exclusions only- half-sibs amongst candidate sires, no sample for 1 known dam
3/1 5 3 5 192 0.29 Exclusions only- full- and half-sibs amongst candidate sires
4/1 6 3 12 192 0.26 Exclusions only- half-sibs amongst candidate sires and no sample for one candidate dam
5/1 11 8 6 192 0.28 Exclusions only- half-sibs amongst candidate parents

Nb. Number of loci differ as trios from breeding facility 1 were genotyped in the first sequencing run whereas trios from breeding facilities 2–5 were sequenced in runs 2, 3 and 4 with a refined marker set. Known dams are according to information provided from studbook management