Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Oct;77(7):2260–2269. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0944-z

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Results, group effect size for Experiment 1a-d; a: Experiment 1a, remapping of a peripheral target, shows a significant face aftereffect (p<.001); Experiment 1b, with a foveal adaptor, shows significant adaptation when a face is briefly foveated (p<.001). Experiment 1c, with inverted stimuli, shows a significant (p=.008) but reduced aftereffect compared to Experiment 1a (p=0.035). Experiment 1d, similar to Experiment 1a but without eye movements and instead with only covert attention to the peripheral adaptors, shows no significant aftereffect (p>.05). Error bars are bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals. b: Psychometric functions from an exemplar subject in Experiments 1a–d. The difference between the functions is the size of the effect.