Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Oct;77(7):2189–2206. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0952-z

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Simulating reward modulation of repetition priming. Left: size of repetition priming in the high-reward and low-reward quadrants, assuming that repetition priming increased by a factor of √2 following a high reward and decreased by the same factor following a low reward. Right: Differences in simulated priming between the high-reward and low-reward quadrants were in line with differences in the observed RT difference between these conditions. Error bars show ±1 standard error of the mean. Some error bars may be too small to see