Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Oct;77(7):2189–2206. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0952-z

Table 2.

Summary of the experimental results for the last four training blocks and the 4 testing blocks. Mean RT difference between the more “important” quadrant and the other quadrants was calculated (in milliseconds and as a percentage saving relative to the mean RT), along with effect size (Cohen’s d) and the 95 % confidence interval (CI)

Last 4 training blocks (learning) Testing blocks (persistence)
Exp. Manipulation Mean (% saving) Cohen’s d 95 % CI (ms) Mean (% saving) Cohen’s d 95 % CI (ms)
1A VSL; mouse response 408 ms
(18 %)
3.32 [272,543] 349 ms
(14 %)
2.30 [182,516]
1B VSL; button press 472 ms
(27 %)
2.80 [289,654] 331 ms
(19 %)
2.20 [165,498]
2 Reward; no deadline 9 ms
(0 %)
0.05 [−192,210] −36 ms
(−0.1 %)
0.22 [−216,144]
3A Reward; mouse response −42 ms
(−0.8 %)
0.24 [−234,150] −41 ms
(−0.6 %)
0.23 [−241,158]
3B Reward; button press 7 ms
(1.5 %)
0.06 [−120,134] −108 ms
(−5 %)
0.55 [−309,104]
4: high recogn. Goals; successful 963 ms
(41 %)
6.12 [796, 1130] 635 ms
(27 %)
2.87 [400,870]
4: others Goals; unsuccessful 30 ms
(1 %)
0.13 [−242,301] 13 ms
(1 %)
0.07 [−194,220]