Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 24;4(7):e001598. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001598

Table 1.

Comparisons Between Patients With Type 4 CRS and Controls

Variables CRS (n=17) Controls (n=16)
Age, y 70±11 62±9*
Female/male 8/9 7/9
Weight, kg 58+14 63+17
SBP, mm Hg 143±21 129±14*
DBP, mm Hg 76±8 79±11
β-Blockers or RAAS inhibitors 17/17 14/16
Biochemical data
 Urea, mmol/L 18.2±9.1 4.8±1.3*
 Creatinine, mg/dL 458±291 81±13*
 eGFR, mL/min 34.2±17.7 84.44±5.3*
 hs-CRP, mg/L 28.3 (3.8 to 98.2) 2.7 (1.3 to 3.5)*
 NT-proBNP, pg/mL 25 944 (4407 to 34 787) 101 (49 to 219)*
 Ang II, ng/L 59.4 (46.1 to 84.4) 39.8 (32.8 to 57.2)*
 SOD, U/mL 93±27 131±20*
Echocardiographic data
 LVPWd, mm 11.1±2.3 8.9±1.1*
 IVSD, mm 11.5±2.4 9.1±1.1*
 LVEDD, mm 57.2±9.2 46.2±2.2*
 EF, % 36.2±9.4 67.3±7.1*

Data were expressed as mean±SD or median (interquartile range). CRS indicates cardiorenal syndrome; Ang II indicates angiotensin II; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; RAAS, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; SOD, superoxide dismutase; LVPWd, left ventricular posterior wall thickness at diastole; IVSD, interventricular septum depth; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; EF, ejection fraction.

*

P<0.05 vs controls.