Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 5;23(11):514–524. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0747-9

Table 2.

Meta-regression analysis results for primary outcome with procedure as covariance. A test of moderators was run by R software programming language to find significant differences between access-site complications and type of procedure. TR-PCI shows more compartment syndrome (p = 0.01) and less early radial occlusion artery (p = 0.06) in comparison to TR-CAG

Complication Qm df P-value
Upper extremity dysfunction 1.0262 2 0.5986
Upper extremity ischaemia 0.7596 2 0.6840
Pain 0.4701 2 0.7905
Radial artery spasm 3.2052 2 0.2014
Severe radial artery spasm 1.6600 2 0.4360
Early radial artery occlusion 5.0693 2 0.0605
Late radial artery occlusion 0.9621 3 0.8104
Minor access-site bleeding 1.6248 2 0.4438
Major access-site bleeding 2.9380 2 0.2302
Minor access-site haematoma 3.4631 2 0.1770
Major access-site haematoma 4.1858 2 0.1233
Perforation 0.8900 2 0.6408
Dissection 0.2113 2 0.8997
Swelling 1.7717 2 0.4124
Compartment syndrome 8.4838 2 0.0144a
Pseudo-aneurysm 1.0197 2 0.6006
Arteriovenous fistula 0.0378 2 0.9813
Infection/Inflammation 0.0380 1 0.8454

TR-CAG transradial catheterisation, TR-PCI transradial percutaneous coronary intervention, Qm Q-model, a measure of model fit.

aSignificant effect of type of procedures on access site complication.