Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 8;92(5):923–939. doi: 10.1007/s11524-015-9982-z

TABLE 2.

Differences in M-SPACES factors between the three study areas

Mean (SD) (n = 454 street segments)
Factors High-density area (Chamartín), n = 124 street segments Median-density area (Ciudad Lineal), n = 152 street segments Low-density area (Carabanchel), n = 178 street segments p Valuea
Walking factors
   Function 1.18 (0.28) 1.41 (0.31) 1.35 (0.33) 0.002*
   Safety 1.07 (0.22) 1.03 (0.24) 1.03 (0.22) 0.026*
   Aesthetics 0.75 (0.25) 0.77 (0.27) 0.91 (0.29) <0.001*
   Destinations 0.55 (0.29) 0.43 (0.27) 0.29 (0.21) <0.001*
Cycling factors
   Function 0.87 (0.24) 0.93 (0.23) 1.00 (0.29) <0.001*
   Safety 1.05 (0.21) 0.94 (0.25) 1.02 (0.23) 0.005*
   Aesthetics 0.44 (0.16) 0.45 (0.18) 0.55 (0.17) <0.001*
   Destinations 0.55 (0.29) 0.43 (0.27) 0.29 (0.21) <0.001*

aStatistical significance of the difference in means across the study areas in each factor (p < 0.05)