Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Apr 23;22(5):508–517. doi: 10.1111/acem.12657

Table 1.

Hemodynamic parameters following cocaine and cocaethylene with treatment from ILE

Cocaine
Cocaethylene
RPP dp/dt −dp/dt Line-P RPP dp/dt
10μM 79 ±5 85 ±4 85 ±5 107 ±3 10μM 84 ±5 90 ±5
+ILE 90 ±2 92 ±3 93 ±3 106 ±5 0.1% EtOH 96 ±2* 99 ±4
30μM 58 ±2 67 ±3 66 ±3 130 ±6 +ILE 101 ±3§ 103 ±4*
+ILE 78 ±5 § 83 ±5 85 ±6 139 ±17 30μM 69 ±4 77 ±3
50μM 51 ±4 59 ±3 59 ±3 162 ±12 0.3% EtOH 82 ±2* 94 ±5§
+ILE 73 ±4 80 ±6 82 ±7 170 ±26 +ILE 94 ±4 100 ±5
100μM 35 ±5 48 ±4 47 ±4 186 ±20 50μM 59 ±5 68 ±4
+ILE 56 ±3 64 ±8 67 ±8 198 ±31 0.5% EtOH 79 ±2 85 ±1
+ILE 84 ±3§ 95 ±5

Values plotted as mean ± standard error (SEM)

RPP = rate pressure product; Line-P = line pressure; ILE = 0.25% infusion of lipid emulsion; EtOH = ethanol; dp/dt =

Difference from analogous treatment condition with cocaine or cocaethylene alone italicized

*

<0.05

§

<0.01

<0.001

<0.0001