Table 4.
Risk of Breast Cancer-specific Mortality among Current Smokers Stratified by Socio-demographic and Prognostic Factors, the Breast Cancer Health Disparities Study.
| Never Smokers | Current vs. Never Smokers | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||
| Events | Total | Events | Total | HR | 95% CIa | p-valueb | |
| Self-reported ethnicity | |||||||
| NHW | 70 | 651 | 29 | 175 | 1.51 | 0.96, 2.38 | 0.98 |
| Hispanic/NA | 76 | 674 | 20 | 123 | 1.58 | 0.94, 2.64 | |
| Native American ancestry | |||||||
| Low | 57 | 593 | 21 | 143 | 1.49 | 0.88, 2.52 | 0.92 |
| Moderate/High | 47 | 464 | 13 | 74 | 1.69 | 0.87, 3.27 | |
| Menopausal status | |||||||
| Premenopausal | 67 | 501 | 20 | 114 | 1.41 | 0.82, 2.42 | 0.89 |
| Postmenopausal | 76 | 803 | 26 | 178 | 1.65 | 1.02, 2.64 | |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | |||||||
| <25 | 48 | 447 | 21 | 135 | 1.33 | 0.77, 2.29 | 0.44 |
| ≥25 | 98 | 878 | 28 | 163 | 1.74 | 1.13, 2.69 | |
| Alcohol consumption | |||||||
| None/Low | 134 | 1155 | 31 | 194 | 1.36 | 0.91, 2.02 | 0.15 |
| Moderate/High | 12 | 170 | 18 | 104 | 2.91 | 1.37, 6.18 | |
| Time since diagnosis | |||||||
| ≤5 years | 69 | 155 | 19 | 42 | 1.40 | 0.79, 2.48 | 0.68 |
| >5 years | 77 | 1170 | 30 | 256 | 1.75 | 1.12, 2.72 | |
| SEER Summary Stage | |||||||
| Local | 47 | 821 | 17 | 185 | 1.66 | 0.94, 2.94 | 0.85 |
| Regional/Distant | 99 | 504 | 32 | 113 | 1.53 | 1.00, 2.34 | |
| ER status | |||||||
| Negative | 34 | 246 | 10 | 49 | 1.58 | 0.75, 3.30 | 0.86 |
| Positive | 85 | 826 | 29 | 190 | 1.55 | 1.00, 2.42 | |
| PR status | |||||||
| Negative | 43 | 346 | 16 | 77 | 1.72 | 0.94, 3.15 | 0.31 |
| Positive | 76 | 726 | 23 | 162 | 1.38 | 0.85, 2.26 | |
Abbreviations: SEER-Surveillance Epidemiology & End Results; ER-Estrogen receptor; PR-Progesterone receptor
Adjusted for age, study, ethnicity, stage, body mass index, alcohol consumption, and education. When modification by a specific factor was evaluated, that factor was not included as a covariate in the multivariable model;
p -value for interaction term. P-values for likelihood ratio tests (difference in Chi-square test statistics for the models) were not significant.