TABLE 1.
Assays compared and test 1 viral loads | No. of samples with test 2 viral loads of: |
Total no. | Concordant samples (%) | No. of quantified samples | Pearson r | % (no.) of samples with differences of: |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
≤1.59 log copies/ml | >1.60 log copies/ml | >0.5 log copies/ml | <0.5 log copies/ml | |||||
NucliSens vs RealTime | 89.74 | 162 | 0.91 | 10.49 (17) | 20.99 (34) | |||
≤1.59 log copies/ml | 83 | 16 | 99 | |||||
>1.60 log copies/ml | 12 | 162 | 174 | |||||
NucliSens vs Xpert | 84.96 | 146 | 0.90 | 4.79 (7) | 26.71 (39) | |||
≤1.59 log copies/ml | 80 | 18 | 98 | |||||
>1.60 log copies/ml | 22 | 146 | 168 | |||||
NucliSens vs Aptima | 83.89 | 163 | 0.89 | 5.52 (9) | 38.65 (63) | |||
≤1.59 log copies/ml | 87 | 34 | 121 | |||||
>1.60 log copies/ml | 14 | 163 | 177 | |||||
RealTime vs Xpert | 89.80 | 82 | 0.98 | 0 (0) | 10.98 (9) | |||
≤1.59 log copies/ml | 50 | 3 | 53 | |||||
>1.60 log copies/ml | 12 | 82 | 94 | |||||
RealTime vs Aptima | 89.78 | 82 | 0.98 | 3.66 (3) | 20.73 (17) | |||
≤1.59 log copies/ml | 41 | 11 | 52 | |||||
>1.60 log copies/ml | 3 | 82 | 85 | |||||
Xpert vs Aptima | 91.37 | 116 | 0.97 | 3.45 (4) | 6.90 (8) | |||
≤1.59 log copies/ml | 64 | 4 | 68 | |||||
>1.60 log copies/ml | 13 | 116 | 129 |