Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 16;53(11):3458–3465. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01806-15

TABLE 3.

Differences between estimated mean viral loads from NucliSens, RealTime, Xpert, and Aptima assays according to HIV-1 subtype

HIV-1 subtype and assays compared Difference between estimated mean viral loads (log copies/ml) Standard error of difference (log copies/ml) Pa
Subtype A1
    NucliSens vs RealTime −0.24 0.09 0.33
    NucliSens vs Xpert −0.64 0.09 <0.01
    NucliSens vs Aptima −0.68 0.09 <0.01
    RealTime vs Xpert −0.40 0.11 0.02
    RealTime vs Aptima −0.44 0.10 <0.01
    Xpert vs Aptima −0.04 0.11 1.00
Subtype B
    NucliSens vs RealTime 0.18 0.06 0.13
    NucliSens vs Xpert 0.06 0.06 1.00
    NucliSens vs Aptima 0.05 0.06 1.00
    RealTime vs Xpert 0.12 0.07 0.93
    RealTime vs Aptima −0.13 0.06 0.82
    Xpert vs Aptima −0.01 0.06 1.00
Subtype C
    NucliSens vs RealTime 0.26 0.10 0.37
    NucliSens vs Xpert −0.21 0.09 0.56
    NucliSens vs Aptima −0.19 0.09 0.37
    RealTime vs Xpert −0.46 0.11 0.01
    RealTime vs Aptima −0.46 0.11 0.02
    Xpert vs Aptima 0.01 0.09 1.00
Subtype CRF02_AG/G
    NucliSens vs RealTime −0.44 0.19 0.63
    NucliSens vs Xpert −0.41 0.17 0.58
    NucliSens vs Aptima −0.58 0.18 0.09
    RealTime vs Xpert 0.03 0.22 1.00
    RealTime vs Aptima −0.14 0.23 1.00
    Xpert vs Aptima −0.17 0.19 1.00
a

Adjusted for multiple comparisons by the Tukey-Kramer method.