TABLE 3.
HIV-1 subtype and assays compared | Difference between estimated mean viral loads (log copies/ml) | Standard error of difference (log copies/ml) | Pa |
---|---|---|---|
Subtype A1 | |||
NucliSens vs RealTime | −0.24 | 0.09 | 0.33 |
NucliSens vs Xpert | −0.64 | 0.09 | <0.01 |
NucliSens vs Aptima | −0.68 | 0.09 | <0.01 |
RealTime vs Xpert | −0.40 | 0.11 | 0.02 |
RealTime vs Aptima | −0.44 | 0.10 | <0.01 |
Xpert vs Aptima | −0.04 | 0.11 | 1.00 |
Subtype B | |||
NucliSens vs RealTime | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.13 |
NucliSens vs Xpert | 0.06 | 0.06 | 1.00 |
NucliSens vs Aptima | 0.05 | 0.06 | 1.00 |
RealTime vs Xpert | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.93 |
RealTime vs Aptima | −0.13 | 0.06 | 0.82 |
Xpert vs Aptima | −0.01 | 0.06 | 1.00 |
Subtype C | |||
NucliSens vs RealTime | 0.26 | 0.10 | 0.37 |
NucliSens vs Xpert | −0.21 | 0.09 | 0.56 |
NucliSens vs Aptima | −0.19 | 0.09 | 0.37 |
RealTime vs Xpert | −0.46 | 0.11 | 0.01 |
RealTime vs Aptima | −0.46 | 0.11 | 0.02 |
Xpert vs Aptima | 0.01 | 0.09 | 1.00 |
Subtype CRF02_AG/G | |||
NucliSens vs RealTime | −0.44 | 0.19 | 0.63 |
NucliSens vs Xpert | −0.41 | 0.17 | 0.58 |
NucliSens vs Aptima | −0.58 | 0.18 | 0.09 |
RealTime vs Xpert | 0.03 | 0.22 | 1.00 |
RealTime vs Aptima | −0.14 | 0.23 | 1.00 |
Xpert vs Aptima | −0.17 | 0.19 | 1.00 |
Adjusted for multiple comparisons by the Tukey-Kramer method.