Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 15;22(6):933–940. doi: 10.1530/ERC-15-0314

Table 1.

Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics (stratified by previous SSA use)

Characteristic SSA naïve (n=41) Previous SSA (n=155) All patients (n=196)
Median age (range), years 59 (37–75) 60 (27–81) 60 (27–81)
Sex, n (%)
 Male 22 (54) 92 (59) 114 (58)
 Female 19 (46) 63 (41) 82 (42)
WHO PS, n (%)a
 0 30 (73) 100 (65) 130 (66)
 1 11 (27) 45 (29) 56 (29)
 2 0 10 (6) 10 (5)
Tumor location, n (%)b
 Foregut 15 (37) 17 (11) 32 (16)
 Midgut 24 (59) 119 (77) 143 (73)
 Hindgut 2 (5) 19 (12) 21 (11)
Histology, n (%)c
 Well differentiated or low-grade 32 (78) 128 (83) 160 (82)
 Moderately differentiated or intermediate-grade 9 (22) 20 (13) 29 (15)
 Poorly differentiated or high-grade 0 1 (<1) 1 (<1)
 Unknown 0 6 (4) 6 (3)
Time since initial diagnosis, n (%)d
 ≤6 months 10 (24) 11 (7) 21 (11)
 >6 months–≤2 years 9 (22) 37 (24) 46 (23)
 >2–≤5 years 14 (34) 35 (23) 49 (25)
 >5–≤10 years 6 (15) 51 (33) 57 (29)
 >10 years 2 (5) 20 (13) 22 (11)
Systemic antitumor drugs, n (%)
 Chemotherapy 11 (27) 43 (28) 54 (28)
 Immunotherapy 1 (2) 18 (12) 19 (10)
 Targeted therapy 1 (2) 13 (8) 14 (7)
 Other 1 (2) 25 (16) 26 (13)
Previous SSA therapy, n (%)
 Octreotide LAR 142 (92) 142 (72)e
 Lanreotide 13 (8) 13 (7)e

WHO PS, World Health Organization performance status; SSA, somatostatin analogues; LAR, long-acting repeatable.

a

Data missing for one patient.

b

Tumors originating in the lung, stomach, duodenum, or pancreas were categorized as foregut NET; those originating in the small intestine, appendix, proximal colon, or of unknown primary sites were considered to be midgut NET; and those with the colon (transverse or distal) or rectum as the primary site were classified as hindgut NET.

c

The histology-based categories as reported in pathology reports. At the time of study conduct, the harmonized definition of grading for NET was not established and the WHO classification was not in practice. Thus, the categories reported here may not translate in to strict numerical categories based on WHO grading (based on mitotic count and/or Ki-67 labeling index) being used in current clinical practice.

d

Data missing for two patients.

e

Total is not 100%, as 41 (21%) patients did not receive prior SSA therapy.