Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 19.
Published in final edited form as: Demogr Res. 2015 Mar 24;32:775–796. doi: 10.4054/demres.2015.32.25

Table 3.

Effect of women’s decision-making autonomy level on child’s enrollment, rural southern Mozambique 2009

A. Total B. Males C. Females

Model 1
B (SE)
Model 2
B (SE)
Model 1
B (SE)
Model 2
B (SE)
Model 1
B (SE)
Model 2
B (SE)
Decision-making autonomy n.a. 0.40(0.19)* n.a. 0.21(0.27) n.a. 0.72(0.27)**
Women’s Characteristics
Age (omitted= 25 or less)
26 to 30 0.47(0.37) 0.45(0.37) −0.23(0.65) −0.24(0.65) 0.91(0.51) 0.85(0.52)
31 or more −0.06(0.37) −0.14(0.37) −0.77(0.64) −0.81(0.64) 0.24(0.5) 0.11(0.51)
Education (omitted= no education)
1 to 4 years 0.65(0.20)** 0.70(0.20)** 0.62(0.29)* 0.65(0.30) 0.75(0.28)** 0.83(0.28)**
5 years or more 1.27(0.29)*** 1.30(0.29)*** 0.89(0.40)* 0.90(0.40)* 1.96(0.47)*** 2.06(0.48)***
Work −0.12(0.19) −0.10(0.02) −0.02(0.28) −0.02(0.28) −0.13(0.27) −0.05(0.28)
Marriage’s Characteristics
Husband-wife age gap (omitted= less than 5 years)
5 to 9 years 0.51(0.24)* 0.48(0.24)* 0.30(0.33) 0.28(0.33) 0.75(0.34)* 0.71(0.34)*
10 to 14 years −0.02(0.29) −0.06(0.29) 0.00(0.42) −0.02(0.42) 0.02(0.41) −0.02(0.41)
15 years or more 0.34(0.38) 0.33(0.38) 0.16(0.50) 0.15(0.50) 0.78(0.59) 0.79(0.58)
Does not know husband’s age −0.07(0.42) −0.02(0.42) −0.04(0.56) −0.02(0.56) −0.31(0.63) −0.20(0.63)
Husband-wife educational gap (omitted= 3 years or less)
4 years or more 0.46(0.26) 0.49(0.26) 0.83(0.41)* 0.85(0.41)* 0.14(0.34) 0.16(0.35)
Does not know husband’s education level −0.81(0.37)* −0.82(0.38)* −1.11(0.56)* −1.12(0.56)* −0.63(0.52) −0.62(0.52)
Polygyny 0.17(0.21) 0.18(0.21) 0.00(0.29) 0.28(0.33) 0.26(0.29) 0.23(0.30)
Co-residence with in-laws −0.01(0.20) −0.02(0.20) 0.06(0.29) −0.02(0.42) −0.27(0.29) −0.31(0.29)
Bridewealth paid 0.01(0.19) 0.05(0.19) −0.14(0.27) 0.15(0.50) 0.13(0.26) 0.21(0.27)
Migrant husband 0.49(0.19)** 0.46(0.19)** 0.41(0.27) −0.02(0.56) 0.73(0.28)** 0.67(0.28)*
Child’s Characteristics
Age 2.1(0.28)*** 2.1(0.28)*** 1.74(0.39)*** 1.74(0.39)*** 2.55(0.43)*** 2.6(0.44)***
Age squared −0.10(0.01)*** −0.10(0.01)*** −0.08(0.02)*** −0.08(0.02)*** −0.12(0.02)*** −0.12(0.02)***
Female 0.04(0.16) 0.04(0.16) n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
Siblings
Younger female sibling 0.08(0.23) 0.08(0.23) 0.19(0.33) 0.19(0.33) 0.00(0.32) −0.02(0.32)
Younger male sibling −0.12(0.24) −0.11(0.24) 0.10(0.33) 0.11(0.33) −0.54(0.36) −0.56(0.36)
Older female sibling −0.40(0.19)* −0.39(0.19)* −0.86(0.27)** −0.85(0.27)** 0.06(0.29) 0.04(0.29)
Older male sibling −0.08(0.20) −0.08(0.20) −0.26(0.29) −0.25(0.29) 0.14(0.29) 0.14(0.29)
Sibling aged less than 5 years −0.11(0.18) −0.10(0.18) 0.1(0.25) 0.1(0.25) −0.33(0.25) −0.30(0.25)
Household’s Characteristics
Household economic status scale 0.21(0.09)* 0.21(0.09)* 0.25(0.13) 0.25(0.13)* 0.17(0.12) 0.17(0.13)
Size of agricultural land 0.10(0.07) 0.08(0.07) 0.13(0.10) 0.12(0.10) 0.08(0.10) 0.06(0.10)
Village
Distance to nearest town −0.01(0.00)** 0.00(0.00)** 0.00(0.00) 0.00(0.00) −0.01(0.00)** −0.01(0.00)*
Primary school in the village 0.76(0.19)*** 0.79(0.20)*** 1.07(0.28)*** 1.07(0.28)*** 0.62(0.28)* 0.68(0.28)*
Clinic in the village 0.20(0.20) 0.20(0.20) −0.09(0.29) −0.10(0.29) 0.51(0.28) 0.58(0.28)*
N 2026 2026 1021 1021 1005 1005

Source: Childbearing Dynamics in a Setting of High HIV Prevalence and Massive ART Rollout Survey, 2009.

*

p<.05;

**

p<.01;

***

p<.001