Table 2. Analyses of the effects of temperature and dietary P:C ratio for host survival using GLM and development time and pupal weight using ANCOVA.

effect	Survival		Development time			Pupal weight
	X2	P	DF	F	P	DF	F	P
Control—unchallenged
initial weight	1.73	0.19	1, 262	32.23	<0.0001	1, 262	59.51	<0.0001
sex	0.54	0.46	1, 262	35.60	<0.0001	1, 262	7.87	0.005
temperature	4.95	0.08	2, 262	803.44	<0.0001	2, 262	24.81	<0.0001
diet	2.43	0.12	1, 262	100.73	<0.0001	1, 262	14.03	0.0002
diet2	11.88	0.0006	1, 262	152.18	<0.0001	1, 262	38.46	<0.0001
temperature × diet	1.75	0.42	2, 262	5.68	0.004	2, 262	3.27	0.04
temperature × diet2	2.81	0.25	2, 262	3.22	0.04	2, 262	3.58	0.03
TnSNPV—challenged
initial weight	0.59	0.44	1, 180	10.60	0.001	1, 176	11.96	0.0007
sex	1.46	0.23	1, 180	15.14	0.0001	1, 176	12.80	0.0004
temperature	0.77	0.68	2, 180	716.95	<0.0001	2, 176	9.82	<0.0001
diet	12.18	0.0005	1, 180	9.80	0.002	1, 176	18.41	<0.0001
diet2	1.67	0.20	1, 180	33.11	<0.0001	1, 176	2.21	0.14
temperature × diet	1.51	0.47	2, 178	0.53	0.59	2, 176	0.76	0.47
temperature × diet2	3.54	0.17	2, 176	0.65	0.52	2, 176	3.68	0.03
AcMNPV—challenged
initial weight	3.87	0.05	1, 166	9.02	0.003	1, 162	4.14	0.04
sex	2.99	0.08	1, 166	14.45	0.0002	1, 162	6.33	0.01
temperature	1.00	0.61	2, 166	1256.41	<0.0001	2, 162	23.33	<0.0001
diet	4.40	0.04	1, 166	33.42	<0.0001	1, 162	18.80	<0.0001
diet2	0.02	0.89	1, 166	77.58	<0.0001	1, 162	21.60	<0.0001
temperature × diet	2.23	0.33	2, 164	0.99	0.37	2, 162	0.13	0.88
temperature × diet2	0.11	0.95	2, 162	0.12	0.89	2, 162	11.39	<0.0001

Analyses were conducted separately for each virus treatment group. Significant results are in bold font.