Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2015 Sep;85(5):452–468. doi: 10.1037/ort0000087

Table 1.

Comparison of Children by Parent’s Conviction Status at Time of “Conviction”Ŧ

Variables No parent convicted Parented convicted of a Substance-related conviction
Dependent Variables Mean (std. dev.) Mean (std. dev.)
 Math (std. score) 0.057 (0.994) −0.291a (0.911)
 Reading (std. score) 0.053 (0.992) −0.272 a (0.942)
(%) (%)
 Absent 18+ days 8.0 12.6a
Covariates (%) (%)
 Convicted parent
  Father 66.9
  Mother 24.7
  Both 8.5
 Type of substance-related conviction
  Felony substance-related conviction 12.8
  Mis. substance-related conviction 41.4
  Mis. driving while under the influence 45.7
 Child: male 50.8 50.2 b
 Free or reduced lunch 36.5 65.2 a
 Free or reduced lunch missing 9.2 2.5 a
 Child’s race/ethnicity
  White non-Hispanic 62.4 53.2 a
  Black non-Hispanic 27.2 38.2 a
  Other non-Hispanic 5.3 6.5 a
  Hispanic 5.1 2.0 a
 Mother < high school degree at child’s birth 19.5 36.1 a
 No father on birth certificate 8.3 6.0 a
 No 1st trimester prenatal care 17.0 24.3 a
 Low or very low birth weight 7.2 9.5 a
Ŧ

Time of conviction is the school-year (July 1-June 30) of the year the parent was convicted (or pseudo convicted). Children whose parents were not convicted of any crime were randomly assigned a pseudo conviction time.

Mis.=Misdemeanor

Grade binary variables omitted from table.

The number of students varied based on the dependent variable. For the children of parents with no-conviction sample there were 517,350 students in the analysis of math, 515,527 in the analysis of reading, and 798,691 in the analysis of truancy. Corresponding numbers for the substance-related conviction sample are 35,133, 34,950, and 49,695, respectively. For children of parents with no-conviction sample there were 800,636 students in the covariates analysis and 49,931 in the substance conviction sample.

a

=p<0.001

b

=p<0.01

c

= p<0.05