Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 6;138(2):674–686. doi: 10.1121/1.4923452

TABLE II.

Post hoc analysis looking at significant differences between the mean stimulus locations, see Fig. 1(a) for locations, of a two-way repeated measures ANOVA on individual bandwidth conditions with dependent variable percent correct and independent variables speaker location and direction the target moved.

Independent variable Degrees of freedom Total degrees of freedom Task condition F p Post hoc pairwise comparisons (Tukey-Kramer, p < 0.05)
Speaker location 9 99 Broadband 9.98 <0.001 Location −75° vs Locations −60°, −30° and 30°
Location −60° vs Locations −75° and 75°
Location −45° vs Locations −30°, −15°, 15° and 30°
Locations −30° and 30° vs Locations −75°, −45° and 75°
Locations −15° and 15° vs Locations −45° and 75°
Locations 75° vs Locations −60°, −30°, −15°, 15° and 30°
Low-pass filtered 10.97 <0.001 Location −75° vs Locations −30°, −15° and 15°
Location −60° vs Locations −15° and 15°
Location −45° vs Location −30°
Location −30° vs Locations −75°, −45° and 75°
Location −15° vs Locations −75° and −60°
Location 15° vs Locations −75°, −60°, 60° and −75°
Location 60° vs Location 15°
Location 75° vs Locations −30° and 15°
Bandpass filtered 37.42 <0.001 Locations −75° to −45° and 45° to 75° vs Locations −30°, −15°, 15° and 30°
Direction target moved 1 11 Broadband 0.20 0.663a
Low-pass filtered 0.21 0.657a
Bandpass filtered 8.66 0.013a
a

Greenhouse-Geisser correction for sphericity.