Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 14;153(8):1464–1478. doi: 10.1017/S0021859614001166

Table 1.

Summary of different inoculation treatments applied in the small plot field trials to evaluate their relative effect on maize yield

Trial type Design Inoculant Treatment P2O5 kg/ha (seed-placed) Field sites Year(s)
Efficacy Split plot Jumpstart commercial rate* 0, 10, 20 Fergus Falls, MN; DeWitt, NE; and Jeffers MN 2006
Formulation Split plot Jumpstart commercial rate* New JumpStart formulation commercial rate 0, 10, 20, 30 Aurora, NE (2009, 2010); Centerville, SD (2009, 2010); Fergus Falls, MN (2009); Garden City KS (2009); Groom, TX (2009); Britten, SD (2010); University of Nebraska, NE (2010) 2009, 2010
Application dribble band RCB Jumpstart commercial rate* 10 DeWitt NE (2006); Fergus Falls, MN (2006, 2007, 2008); Centerville, SD (2007, 2008); Jeffers, MN (2006); Gardener, ND (2008); York, NE (2007) 2006, 2007, 2008
Application granule RCB Jumpstart commercial rate* Granules at 1, 2 and 3 times commercial seed rate 10 DeWitt NE (2006); Fergus Falls, MN (2006, 2007, 2008); Centerville, SD (2007, 2008); Jeffers, MN (2006); Gardener, ND (2008); York, NE (2007) 2006, 2007, 2008
Miscellaneous inoculant combinations§ RCB Jumpstart commercial rate* JumpStart with and without other commercial inoculants 10 60 2006–2010
*

5 × 104 colony forming units (cfu) P. bilaiae/seed.

Test formulation.

Randomized complete block.

§

Individual trial data not included.