Skip to main content
. 2003 Apr 15;9(4):635–640. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i4.635

Table 3.

Summary of locoregional or systemic chemotherapy for prevention of recurrence

Authors Entry criteria Treatment protocol Sample size (Tx/Crl) Observation time DFS (Tx vs Ctl) OS (Tx vs Ctl) Conclusions
Yamamoto[20] Liver cacner study HCFU 67 (32/35) 6-10 years Stage Ib cirrhosis Stage I cirrhosis Beneficial only to
group of japan for 200 mg, bid 62% vs 32% 79% vs 70% patients with
UICC stage II HCCa Stage II cirrhosis Stage II cirrhosis Stage I liver
0% vs 0%c 59% vs 57%c dys function
Kohno[21] NA UFT 300 mg, qd vs 88 (40/48) NA 3-year NA Not effective
UFT 300 mg, qd + A 37% vs 32%
(ia, 40 mg/m2, once)
Ono[22] NA A 40 mg/m2 ia and 56 (29/27) 24 months NA NA Not effective,with
40 mg/m2 iv every poor tolerance
3 months for 2 years,
and HCFU 300 mg
qd for 2 years
Ueno[23] NA CDDP 50-80 mg and 21 (11/10) > 1 year 70% vs 20%c NA Beneficial
MMC 10 mg ia, 2-3 times

NA: Not available; A: Adriamycin or Epirubicin; ia: Intraarterially; iv: Intravenously; DFS: Disease free survival; OS: Overall survival.

a

complete excision of a solitary tumor, less than 5 cm in diameter, with a tumor capsule and no vascular invasion to the first or second branches of the portal vein, or for other stage II tumors, complete removal with a surgical margin from the tumor edge of more than 1 cm;

b

see the original paper;

c

estimated according to the figure in authors’ paper.