Skip to main content
. 2003 Apr 15;9(4):665–669. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i4.665

Table 1.

Relationship between ER, ERmRNA expression and pathology in gastric cancer

Pathology Male
Female
Total
n ER (+) % ERmRNA (+) % n ER (+) % ERmRNA (+) % n ER (+) % ERmRNA (+) %
Borrmann I 3 1 33.3 1 33.3 3 0 0 2 66.7 6 1 16.7 3 50.0
II 4 1 25.0 3 75.0 4 2 50.0 3 75.0 8 3 37.5 6 75.0
III 4 1 25.0 3 75.0 4 2 50.0 4 100.0 8 3 37.5 7 87.5
IV 4 2 50.0 4 100.0 4 3 75.0 4 100.0 8 5 62.5 8 100.0
Papillary 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Tubular 6 0 0 4 66.7 6 1 16.7 5 88.3 12 1 8.3 10 83.3
Poorly differentiated 7 4 57.1 6 85.7 6 4 66.7 6 100.0 13 8 61.5 11 84.6
Signet ring cell 1 1 100.0 1 100.0 2 2 100.0 2 100.0 3 3 100.0 3 100.0
Nondiffused 9 2 22.2 6 66.7 5 1 20.0 4 80.0 14 3 21.4 10 71.4
Diffused 6 3 50.0 5 83.3 10 6 60.0 9 90.0 16 9 56.3 14 87.5
Lymph node 0 3 0 0 1 33.3 4 0 0 3 75.0 7 0 0 4 57.1
Involvemen ≤ 3 4 1 25.0 3 75.0 5 3 60.0 4 80.0 9 4 44.4 7 77.8
4~6 6 2 33.3 5 83.3 5 3 60.0 5 100.0 11 5 45.5 10 90.9
> 6 2 2 100.0 2 100.0 1 1 100.0 1 100.0 3 3 100.0 3 100.0
Age ≤ 55 6 3 50.0 4 66.7 9 3 33.3 7 77.8 15 6 40.0 11 73.3
> 55 9 2 22.2 7 77.8 6 4 66.7 6 100.0 15 6 40.0 13 86.7
Total 15 5 33.3 11 73.3 15 7 46.7 13 86.7 30 12 40.0 24 80.0